Ouroboros is regarded with horror by the British Left who believe such cannot be the case for the International is immortal, but if it is not secular it is not correct so how close are those opposed (in theory if not in practice), to monarchical rule to those opposed to republican democracy? The question raises its head time and time again. There are historial reasons why they might be, quote; "All three of the articles above touch on the rumoured conspiracy
that, "The pursuit of happiness", the phrase that
appears in The Declaration of Independence that is held in the
National Archives Museum in Washington, was not
the phraseology that appeared in a preceding, and original, document
(signed by possibly more -or the same number-, of the Founding Fathers
than the other).
Arendt would I think agree that as the upshot of "The American
Revolution" was to see the instigation of, "perpetual war"
between the republic and democracy and if, "by their works shall
ye now them" it would not be surprising to discover that an
earlier more egalitarian drafting of The Declaration existed. The
notion that the learned elders were incapable of explicating from
both the British and (at that time burgeoning), French revolutions a more egalitarian (and enlightened),
conception of social
well-being and social order seems most errant nonsense and is given no
credence by the correspondence quoted in my previous post
warning Washington of the influence of Illuminati, "free-marketeers"
within the American Lodges. This "preceding document" to which I refer
is supposed to have contained the phrase; "the pursuit of public happiness" rather than the shorter apparently more individualistic but nevertheless object-less (and therefore meaningless?), one that appears on the version that is extant, it has also been suggested that
Washington and others were responsible for secreting the original
document away from the centres of power and beyond-the-gaze
of those who wanted its destruction. That we now see how
America continually, "makes its war on its children" should also
give credence to the notion that The New World never did truly sever
its links with the old and simply substituted a dictatorial republican
hierarchy for a monarchical one, that these same republicans should
have been relying so heavily on our queen in order to maintain the
status quo and further their own social- Darwinist agenda in recent
years also suggests that the full story of The American Revolution
(and how it
is not yet over),
has been deliberately kept from the American people.
One may argue that the Democrats seem to have no place in the conspiracy but surely as they see democracy as being at odds with the republic they too have a stake? This unresolved conflict has resulted in suffering and death not only for America's own people but for the people of The World now also." Go to: https://www.arafel.co.uk/2018/02/part-2-washingtonpost.html & https://www.arafel.co.uk/2018/02/part-1-of-discussion-concerning.html
Much the American Right object to is anathema to the British Left also and there are many in both camps who (whether they admit it or not), are clearly anarchists! It is no sin to have noble intentions but it is to bury one's talents and this is what those in the Old Country do when they fail to reach out to those in the New, vanguardist intellectuals would rather preach from their imperial thrones than lower themselves to mingle with the New World's "hoi polloi" (America can deal with the "huddled-masses" we were never very good at that -which is why the huddled-masses left of-course-)!
Revolutionaries legitimise neoliberalism (or such is the trope), and the vested interests of the status quo squirm with delight as they divide and rule. So is it a willingness to resort to violence that unites the anarchists of both lands? No for violence is that which divides and yet is successful in justifying the supreme violence of emotional and intellectual poverty that characterises neoliberal Thanatos.
In a nutshell we Brits are snobbish ("yeah well we could have told you that Limey!"), however, we are also equally incapable of stating our own case to the, "Yanks" preferring, perhaps, to pretend that we never had an empire to steal in the first place (still swimming in a river in Egypt).
One can list the real concerns which seem to unite the truly oppositional factors to both regimes though; surveillance, enviro-toxins (esp. re: health and safety at work), control of the military/industrial complex (esp. re: secret research), child abuse and paedophilia by those in power and the influence of secret societies and financial cabals, however, there are those issues which should unite the opposition but seem rather (prima facie at least), to divide. "C'est la vie" the French might observe and it has ever been thus (or, "it's as good today as it's always been"), for nothing was ever achieved without effort (and effort the complacent British Left -esp. "Old Labour"-, has never been prepared to make, one reason being -I mean other than the Old Labour attachment to the first-past-the-post electoral system, quote; "What this also means is that the Labour Party perforce must perpetuate (and even proselytise for -quietly whilst never doing "the other"-), the First Past the Post electoral system (so one can't blame it all on Mr.Patrick Ashdown). Clearly they do this because they feel that they must enforce the Balmoralisation of the British public in order to maintain (even the possibility now of), power, why they think this is the case is interesting for they obviously have no faith in the British public to come to similar conclusions concerning their own welfare on a significant enough basis to enable the Labour Party to come to power in England under a proportionately representative electoral system."..."it is these obvious contradictions which identify the effects of the British Labour Party's reliance on the creaking constitution of the realm. The fact is that the British Labour Movement does not now (neither ever has been able to), properly represent the electorate's interest's in Europe, the truth is that they fear European democracy for her eyes are led straight to the dichotomy between Labourite power and self-governance." Go to: https://www.arafel.co.uk/2016/12/a-place-to-talk.html -, that "green-wellied" British environmentalists have consistently failed to address the concerns of the workers -another argument against "-isms" of all kinds-, for it is the state of both the working and domestic environments that most concerns them yet in order to change the nature of same alternative employment in alternative industries must be available), quote; "Socialist systems rely on the institutions of the state (many of which being pre-existing), to run the economy, communist systems rely on communes to dictate to (and often form), state institutions. The notions are very different, for a socialist there is no “communal filter” between the individual and the insitutions of the state but for a communist the state doesn’t exist without one (the capitalist, of-course, their actions being anathema to community, doesn’t believe in society at all). This exemplifies the veracity of the maxim; “the trouble with “-isms” is that they are full of “-ists”!”
The fact that neither Lenin or Stalin understood the difference is an exemplar of the problem it does not discredit either socialisation or commun-isation as necessary aspects of the emergent "economic" (see definition below), model.
Schumacher and emergence theory allow for no dominant political ideology. So where is democracy? Well for one thing it ought to be clear by now that politics al.la the Industrial Revolution model is on its last legs, the G7 summit will be tackling the global problems of environmental damage, lack of biodiversity and sustainability issues that barely got a mention in the mainstream media (MSM), a hundred years ago. This macrocosm shines a light on the microcosm of our individual politics.." https://www.arafel.co.uk/2021/06/a-dangerous-conflation-socialism.html
Schumacher was "adopted" by the British middle-class intelligentsia and, therefore, has been consistently misrepresented by them, now, in order to bring the British economic system back into balance following years of "labouring under" (Ha! Mr Blair!), a Thatcherite laissez-faire philosophy that granted ultimate freedom to pre-existing capital, only a socialist like Jeremy Corbyn represents the, "art of the possible".
The "intersectionalities" to which I refer are many and varied but I like to think that I have touched on the majority of them in the following Twitter "Moments":
Nb. Thanks to @TwitterSupport et.al none of the following Moments are reported as visible by my online "Hebrews" on the Lifeboat News: https://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/index.html or 5Filters: https://forum.5filters.info/latest although some have reported seeing this..
When I have successfully transcribed the contents of the following they will appear on Blogger as separate (and regularly -ie. when relevant and/or possible-, updated), posts:
1. "The False Philosophy that Underpins the Oil Industry" #Incineration
"HISTORY OF THE ANTI-WIRELESS MOVEMENT
In 1996, when almost no one owned a cell phone, and WiFi had not yet been
invented, organizations formed to oppose wireless technology in order to protect
our world from an unprecedented assault. The telecommunications industry planned
to put a cell phone in the hands of every man, woman and child so they could
communicate instantaneously from any point on Earth to any other point on Earth.
In order to accomplish this, and for the first time in the history of the planet, every
square inch of the Earth was going to be bathed in microwave radiation at all times.
Also every human being – all seven billion of us – were going to become sources of
such radiation. This was also unprecedented. Human beings, like all other creatures,
were part of nature, not its enemy. But for the first time in the history of the Earth,
every member of one of its species was going to be emitting radiation wherever they
Today, in 2021, when almost everyone owns a cell phone, WiFi, and an average of
23 other wireless devices, both the organizations and their goals have changed.
Health and nature have already been destroyed, and the fight is no longer against
wireless technology but, often, against each other. The purpose of this article is to
review this history in order to remind people of the purpose of our movement and to
unify and redirect global action once again to where it needs to be: against all of
wireless technology in order to stop the radiation and recover our health and
environment before it is too late. I will focus this article on the opposition in the
United States because I am most familiar with it, but similar dynamics have been
operating in other countries.
On February 8, 1996, the Telecommunications Act was signed into law, mandating
the rollout of wireless technology across America, and prohibiting local governments
from protecting their citizens’ health and environment from the radiation that it
produces. Both existing and new organizations all over the United States united to
oppose wireless technology and to try to restore democracy.
The EMR Alliance, which until that time had focused on radiation from power lines
and computers, now directed its energies to fight cell towers. Citizens for the
Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities was organized. I helped
found the Cellular Phone Task Force to oppose not just cell towers but cell towers’
reason for being, which is cell phones. Other organizations that formed included Noe
Valley Families Against the Antennas; Healthy Home Alliance; Families for
Appropriate Cellular Tower Siting; Ulysses Citizens for Responsible Technology;
Hardwick Action Committee; Thistle Hill Neighborhood Alliance; Coalition of
Concerned Citizens for Responsible Technologies; Citizens of Marin for Sensible
Communications Planning; Northboro Residents for Responsible Tower Siting;
Telecommunications Master Plan Coalition of San Francisco; and Rainier Valley
Association for Safe Wireless Technology. These and other groups, individuals, public
officials, and the Communications Workers of America, joined together to sue the
Federal Communications Commission in order to protect health, nature and
In 2000, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against us, and the Supreme Court
refused to hear our case.
In the aftermath of our failure, a national coalition called the EMR Network was
formed to try to unify efforts to protect us all against radiation. But in the five years
since the passage of the Telecommunications Act, a majority of the population had
acquired cell phones, and many had also acquired WiFi, which had recently been
invented. Cracks formed in the coalition, which was beginning to split into factions.
One faction still opposed all of wireless technology. Another opposed cell towers but
not cell phones, as if one could exist without the other, and as if the radiation did not
come from both. A third represented the interests of people who called themselves
electrically sensitive. And not only were there differences of opinion among us, but
outside interests had infiltrated our movement and helped to divide us.
The EMR Alliance, which had previously functioned as a national coalition, vanished.
Its corporate counsel, Michael Withey, was the head of a national network of
personal injury lawyers hunting for million dollar lawsuits, called the Electromagnetic
Radiation Case Evaluation Team (EMRCET). When those lawyers concluded that ours
was a losing cause and there was no money to be made from lawsuits about
electromagnetic radiation, EMRCET disbanded, and the EMR Alliance also
Another lawyer, James Hobson, who had represented most of the parties before the
Second Circuit, and who became counsel for the EMR Network, was a
telecommunications lawyer who, simultaneous to representing the parties against
the FCC, represented a number of telecommunications companies, as well as the
Telecommunications Industry Association, on other matters. He had also previously
been in-house counsel for the FCC.
George Carlo, a lawyer as well as a scientist, who had headed up the
telecommunications industry’s effort to prove cell phones safe, made headlines
when he switched sides and wrote a book condemning cell phones as dangerous. It
was titled Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age. He attempted to join the
national coalition against wireless technology, but like Hobson, not everyone trusted
him. He had spent most of his career as a scientist-for-hire working for major
polluters. In addition to being hired by the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association to prove cell phones safe, he had been a consultant to the Tobacco
Institute, Dow Chemical, Dow Corning, the Chlorine Institute and other polluters and
published articles for two decades purporting to show that tobacco smoke, breast
implants, dioxins, herbicides, and other chemicals were not dangerous.
Eventually the EMR Network, beset by internal quarreling, broke up and yet another
coalition, called the EMR Policy Institute, formed. And gradually, over the years, as
the wireless industry’s adversaries came more and more to also be its customers,
they abandoned, for the most part, the fight to protect human health, nature, and
democracy. Many opponents of cell towers today are not only not opposed to cell
phones, but they are heavily addicted to them and have damaged their health from
years of exposing themselves to their radiation. The birds, insects and animals have
already disappeared from their yards and they have grown used to living without
them. I used to get more calls asking how to help fight wireless technology. Now,
more often, people call me or email me from their cell phones asking me what is the
safest kind of cell phone to use, how far away from their body to hold it, what kinds
of devices will best neutralize the radiation, and how to distinguish a 5G tower from
a 4G tower. When I tell them that radiation is radiation, that there is no way to
“neutralize” it, that distance doesn’t matter, and that it is destroying the Earth
regardless of what you call it, they don’t understand what I am saying. More and more, they ask, in frustration, “What is the alternative?” And when I answer that the
alternative to not having a cell phone is the imminent, well-under-way destruction of
all life on Earth, including their own, they don’t seem to register what I am saying.
They simply can’t imagine living without a cell phone. ECHOEarth (End Cellphones
Here On Earth), an organization that I helped create in May 2020 in order to build a
movement to abandon wireless technology, still has fewer than 2,000 members
although 300,000 people and organizations have signed the International Appeal to
Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.
Meanwhile the EMR Policy Institute has also disappeared and a lot of new
organizations have taken its place. The focus of many is not to stop wireless
technology, or even cell towers, any more, but just to stop the newest version of
them, which is called “5G”. There is an international coalition called Stop 5G
International. In the United States there are Stop 5G Chicago, Stop 5G San Diego,
Stop 5G Hawaii, Stop 5G Georgia, 5G Free California, 5G Free Vermont, 5G
Awareness Now, 5G Colorado Action, Citizens Against 5G Cell Towers, and dozens of
other organizations with similar names. For many it is not because they no longer
think radiation is harmful, but because they have given up trying to stop it, and
because most of their members own cell phones.
And there are still outside interests assuming positions of leadership in our
movement, and telecommunications lawyers representing us in court. Children’s
Health Defense, directed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is doing wonderful advocacy
work. However, it has been represented in its legal work against 5G by Scott
McCollough, a telecommunications lawyer. Like George Carlo and James Hobson, he
claims to have switched sides, but his website does not say anything of the sort, and
he has told me that he does not believe RF radiation harms everyone, just people
with electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
And there is a new national coalition that is now filling the void left by the EMR
Policy Institute. It holds Zoom meetings every other Friday, and has invited a series
of excellent speakers to present at these meetings. But they are only speaking to the
choir, and the organizer of that coalition, Odette Wilkens, is a technology lawyer who
makes her living representing IBM. IBM is the company that launched a “Smarter
Planet” campaign in 2008 and a “Smarter Cities Challenge” in 2010. Everything IBM
does today depends on cell phones and wireless technology. I have asked Odette
whether she has a conflict of interest, but she has not responded. She is also an
animal rights activist for which I admire her and I would like to be able to trust her,
but she has give me no reason to do so.
Odette tried to sabotage the amicus brief that was filed in support of our current
petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. She convinced the coordinator of the amicus
brief not to file it, after a lot of organizations had already signed on and people had
already donated money toward it, so that I had to find another organization on short
notice to take over the effort and get it filed. She told a lot of people why not to sign
on to the amicus brief and why not to donate money toward it. It was after she did
this that I investigated her and discovered who she works for. Her new website,
wiredbroadband.org, doesn’t even have her name anywhere on it. In an interview (at
37:55) she said, falsely, that the preemption clause in the Telecommunications Act,
which we are again asking the Supreme Court to strike down, does not apply to 5G
and that people should not worry about it. She said that local governments are free
to prohibit 5G towers to protect our health and environment because they provide
“broadband” services and not “cell phone” services.
But that is false. Today “cellular” and “broadband” have merged and there is no
difference. 5G provides both voice and internet services. And the preemption clause
does not say “cell towers,” it says “personal wireless service facilities,” which
encompasses everything. We are back before the Supreme Court after twenty years
asking it, again, to strike down that clause, in order to restore to local governments
the right to protect our health and environment, and impose liability on
telecommunications companies that injure and kill people. In 2000, the Second
Circuit addressed only the issue of States’ Rights. Today we are asking for our
Personal Rights to life, liberty, and property. And in our petition to the Supreme
Court we are represented not by telecommunications lawyers, but by lawyers with
expertise in environmental law and civil rights.
The radiation emitted by cell phones is more, not less harmful than the radiation
emitted by cell towers. There are 15 billion mobile devices in the world, and only
seven million towers. And the phones are right next to everyone’s body. The main
difference is that people have become used to them. People have become used to
the absence of butterflies and sparrows. People have become used to being fat and
diabetic, and at risk for heart attacks and strokes. By this newsletter I am reaching
out to all organizations and people who love this Earth. I ask them to remember
what they are fighting for and to unite together in a campaign to abandon wireless
technology and eliminate cell phones from this planet in order to save it. Cell phones
are not the only threat to life on Earth, but they are the most urgent.
Cell phones are effectively radioactive devices. The idea that they are not radioactive
comes from a mistaken distinction that the medical community made a century ago,
which most people persist in believing despite a century of research showing that
distinction to be little more than a fantasy. It is a fantasy that says that (a) only
radiation above a certain frequency is energetic enough to remove electrons from
molecules to form ions, (b) this causes genetic mutations which are the cause of
cancer, and (c) radiation is harmless if it does not cause cancer.
The most obvious of those fictions is that radiation has no effects besides cancer.
Whereas in fact radiation acts directly on the electrons in our mitochondria, slowing
metabolism, making us hypoxic, and causing diabetes, heart disease and, yes, cancer.
Radiation also acts directly on all the electric transmission lines in our bodies,
including our nerves, our blood vessels, our heart’s pacemaker, and yes – even
though western medicine doesn’t recognize their existence – our acupuncture
meridians. All this plays havoc with life and in just 26 years has wiped out most of the
Earth’s insects, a large percentage of the small birds, and is imminently threatening
to put an end to what’s left – including us – if we do not put an end to it.
Please work with me on a campaign to abolish cell phones. It is necessary, it is
realistic, and the alternative is unthinkable. Thousands of people have written to me
over the past few years asking how they can help. You can all help to begin this
movement by throwing away your cell phones and joining ECHOEarth. As soon as
enough people have joined ECHOEarth so that it has strength in numbers, I will
contact the people who want to work on this in earnest and we can discuss the next
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Administrator, International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
Caretaker, ECHOEarth (End Cellphones Here On Earth)
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
phone: +1 505-471-0129
January 26, 2022
The last 35 newsletters, including this one, are available force.org
January 26, 2022
The last 35 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading and
sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the
newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, French, Norwegian,
To subscribe, go to SUBSCRIBE • Cellular Phone Task Force."
This subject is ignored as a human rights issue because WiFi tech. is considered the province of the neo-liberal (and trespassers will be exterminated), nevertheless, I give no one permission to invade my aura and penetrate my body and reserve the right to protest such intrusions!
All of the above creates dependency, the need to buy stuff drives the need to work for a wage and, in turn, drives the need to behave in approved ways to secure/keep the job. Unless and until one can step outside of this, the insanity of it all is concealed many layers deep.I don’t know if 5G radiation is dangerous but it seems highly likely, the further embedding of this sick matrix of falsified needs certainly is"..
"Latest vignette of borg-life in the village near where I live: Young fellow in his twenties, off one of the new green-field-raping ‘developments’ of oversized, under-insulated ‘superior homes’: rolling along on an electric scooter, one hand on the handle-bars, other holding a twat-phone before his eyes, keeping him hypnotised…
Rude awakening for his generation when The Limits To Growth take away all the toys, and insist on a lot more harder-working life, for a whole lot less reward, beyond the bare necessities."...
"To go #EthernetOnly on you home router (first make sure you have an Ethernet cable connected from your router to your device), find the passwords on your router* & access “settings” with the I.P address (this varies depending on your service provider eg.:https://support.plume.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360020332234-Disable-Wi-Fi-TalkTalk -Nb. if you Google your service provider's I.P address re: “settings” you should find it easily enough-), and “log-in” using your WiFi Network Title & the WiFi Password and the same to disable the WiFi, do not use either the Router Username or Router Password or your I.P address will no longer be recognised and you will need to reset the router to default (by using the “pin-hole” reset button on the back of the router and depressing it for at least 30 secs), and re-access the I.P address to use the correct title and password (if you do reset to default the WiFi signal will be re-enabled and you will need to disable it again).
*You will find the WiFi Network Title, WiFi Password, Router Username and Router Password on the back of your router.
Don’t make it easy do they? You’d think that a simple on-off button on the router would suffice! It’s like when I tell people I don’t own a mobile-phone and don’t want a Smart Box, they genuinely seem to think I’m crazy (“abnormal”), consent is presumed guys, this should give the lie to the whole charade.
Any problems, contact your service provider!"...
"I might be able to lay my hands on one of those gizmos that will transmit your network traffic via the electrical circuit. Anyone tried that?"...
"Yeah that’s Ethernet…should go fine…I run mine straight from the router (sometimes you might need a longer Ethernet lead than usual -depending on your set-up-, but most suppliers can accommodate longer peer-peer extensions), …but you can connect in any room in your domicile on the same circuit if you have the requisite plug adaptors…YouTube should have a tutorial…it’s not difficult…let me know if you have any problems…
G" Discussion on the #5filters forum.
An intersectionality surely not to be missed... (in any way)
..another being (of-course), the vaccination issue concerning the Covid19 pandemic, however, therein lies another tale, for censorship of free speech with regard to this subject has already led to many (incl. more than once myself), having access to social-media restricted by the Powers that Be, people have turned to other more proactively community-based forms of protests in reaction. For more on this story please see the Covid category on the 5filters forum: https://forum.5filters.info/c/covid/9
I also recommend you use the 5filters search facility to look (in all categories), for my work on Viktor Schauberger and Hans Kammler et.al (the work would appear as a Twitter "Moment" -as would work on genetically modified organisms, "GMOs"-, above but since Twitter changed the formatting -typical-, I have been loathe to post any-more Moments -and now there are other problems too, apparently, see above Ed.-), quote; "“are you saying that you think these early flying saucers were experimental vehicles created by us?” Oh yes…I’m afraid so, also, unlike rocketry, the technology would seem to have gone to all the Allies…it now informs all of the Deep State and included, I deeply suspect, what remained of the NAZI eugenics programme (mainly in S.America). The Operation Highjump, New Swabia*, Admiral Richard E Byrd story is ridiculous, it’s urban legend**, yet it would appear to have happened (and just before Roswell).
*New Swabia in the Antarctic was real, it is in the German archives.
**The truly weird thing about NAZI “urban legends” (incl. the S.America - bio-weapons/eugenics connection), is that they would appear to be true. I mean check out …
"Frank Döbert and Rainer Karlsch
Immediately after the end of World War II, the victorious powers began to interrogate the functional elites of the National Socialist state. When the question came to the German V-weapons programs, jet fighters and underground armament factories, the name of Hans Kammler was mentioned again and again. In the final phase of the war, the SS Obergruppenfuehrer and head of the Office of Unit C of the Economic Administration Main Office of the SS had been given far-reaching competences for the production and use of the latest weapons. The Allies were aware of Kammler, even though they knew far from everything about his “underground shadow realm,” his role in the Holocaust and the mass use of concentration camp inmates in construction projects. They searched intensively for him, but, according to the standard narrative until only a few years ago, came too late. Kammler had allegedly evaded his culpability and committed suicide in Bohemia on 9 May 1945. Doubts about this account, however, were never completely silenced, especially since his body was never located and all personal documents remained missing. Gerald Fleming, a leading Holocaust researcher, wanted certainty but could not find sufficient evidence to prove that the suicide narrative was not true. Fleming urged us not to let the story rest but to continue the research. 
In the article „Ein inszenierter Selbstmord. Überlebte Hitlers „letzter Hoffnungsträger“, SS Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler den Krieg? [A staged suicide. Did Hitler’s “Last Hopeful,” SS Obergruppenfuehrer Hans Kammler, Survive the War?], published in the Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft in 2014, for the first time declassified documents and statements were presented which suggest that Hans Kammler was captured by the Counterintelligence Corps, an American military intelligence service." https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/hans-kammler-hitlers-last-hope-american-hands
"The Western Group of ships reached the Marquesas Islands on December 12, 1946, whereupon the Henderson and Cacapon set up weather monitoring stations. By December 24, the Currituck had begun launching aircraft on reconnaissance missions.
The Eastern Group of ships reached Peter I Island in late December 1946.
On December 30, 1946 the Martin PBM-5 George 1 crashed on Thurston Island killing Ensign Maxwell A. Lopez, ARM1 Wendell K. Henderson, and ARM1 Frederick W. Williams. The other 6 crew members were rescued 13 days later. These and Vance N. Woodall, who died on January 21, 1947, were the only fatalities during Operation Highjump.
On January 1, 1947, Lieutenant Commander Thompson and Chief Petty Officer Dixon utilized “Jack Browne” masks and DESCO Oxygen rebreathers to log the first dive by Americans under the Antarctic. Paul Allman Siple, Ph.D. was the senior U.S. War Department representative on the expedition. Dr. Siple was the same Eagle Scout who accompanied Admiral Byrd on the previous Byrd Antarctic expeditions.
Naval ships and personnel were withdrawn back to the United States in late February 1947, and the expedition was terminated." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Highjump
“The Roswell UFO incident in popular lore refers to the rumors and speculation regarding a July 1947 United States Army Air Forces balloon crash at a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico. Following local press interest in debris gathered from the crash site, and rumors that the debris came from a “flying disc”, the US military stated that the crashed object was merely a conventional weather balloon.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident
“Aliens” became the cover story…this lead to the Majestic Twelve, Eisenhower’s famous “warning” speech and (a recent publication speculates), the assassination of JFK… (did Blair know that Smith had been assassinated?), …
"Admiral Byrd revealed in a press interview that Task Force 68 had encountered a new enemy that could fly from pole to pole at incredible speeds.
Admiral Byrd’s statements were published in the Chilean Press but never publicly confirmed by US authorities. Indeed Byrd did not speak again to the Press about Operation Highjump, leaving it for researchers to speculate for decades over what really happened, and why Byrd was silenced. After the Soviet collapse in 1991, the KGB released previously classified files that cast light on the mysterious Byrd led Naval expedition to Antarctica. A 2006 Russian documentary, recently translated, made public for the first time a 1947 secret Soviet intelligence report commissioned by Joseph Stalin of Task 68’s mission to Antarctica. The intelligence report, gathered from Soviet spies embedded in the US, revealed that the US Navy had sent the military expedition to find and destroy a hidden Nazi base. On the way, they encountered a mysterious UFO force that attacked the military expedition destroying several ships and a significant number of planes. Indeed, Operation Highjump had suffered many casualties as stated in initial press reports from Chile" https://galnet.fandom.com/wiki/Did_US_Navy_battle_UFOs_protecting_Nazi_Antarctic_sanctuary_in_1947%3F 1 #TruthisStrangerthanFiction"
Also, quote; ""Viktor Shauberger was born in Holzschlag (Austria) on June 30 1885. His family’s traditional way of life was closely related to forestry for generations, spanning well over 400 years. According to some sources, his family tree can be traced back to 1,230 AD to one of the distinguished German aristocratic dynasties of land owners of that time.
It seemed Viktor had nature in his genes, including the insatiable
fascination with forest and water phenomena. After WW1, his own work as a
forester, included having responsibility for over ten thousand hectares
of forest land. We can say that this area served as a living laboratory
for Viktor and at the same time as an endless source of inspiration for
his scientific ideas. During this period his way of thinking and
practical approaches in his scientific work were shaped by the phenomena
he observed in nature. His leading principle of work and innovation was
“kapieren und kopeiren” which means to comprehend and copy nature and
was derived from his unrivalled ability as an observer of nature’s
secrets. His study of the spiralling forms and vortexes in water and
other natural phenomena was the catalyst to many of his inventions and
implosion technologies whose spiralling movements fully harmonized with
those found throughout the cosmos, and became the dominant principle
seen in his work. They also had no harmful polluting emissions.
One of his more esoteric projects occurred In the middle of the WWII when he was working under the close surveillance and control of SS troops in Nazi Germany, on a project which saw him designing an anti-gravity motor for a prototype “flying saucer” know as the Vril. Viktor was forced to work for the Nazis in the Mauthausen concentration camp, with the threat of death an ever present reality. The Nazis focused only on the possible military application of his ideas. The unscrupulous actions of first, Nazi Germany then Soviet Russia and eventually Cold War America to use his inventions for their own selfish purposes, completely ruined and finally destroyed his life.
“Implosion is no invention in the conventional sense, but rather the renaissance of ancient knowledge” - Viktor Schauberger
Later, Russian forces laid waste to his apartment in a desperate attempt to gain the secrets of his inventive mind. Even liberation did not bring the long anticipated improvement to Viktor’s position. He was held as a prisoner for over a year by the American occupation troops. Eventually he was forced to “sell” all his patents for one single ticket which was to allow him to get back home to Austria, but only five days after his arrival in Linz (Austria), he died on September 25, 1958 at the age of 73, a broken man.*
Along with his amazing inventions, Viktor’s legacy includes books
showcasing his brilliant insights into the workings of nature. These
were translated into English by researcher Callum Coats and named ‘The
Eco-Technology series’. These include: ‘Nature as Teacher’, ‘The Energy
Evolution’, ‘The Fertile Earth’ and his magnum opus, ‘Living Energies’,
which could best be described as the bible for Shauberger students.They
contain many of Schauberger’s original drawings and patents. The number
of new editions produced by Coates and other authors is the best
testament to Viktor Schauberger’s popularity and his visionary work
inspires the imagination to this day."…
"His theory about the vortex is based on water’s
regeneration through the implosion or inward movement, where the water is being oxygenated in a coherent and logical crystal pattern."** https://www.cosmicpolymath.com/viktor-schauberger.html
*Italics mine. So it seems that his freedom was held ransom, he had
been in the SS so the Americans could use leverage on him, leverage they
(more or less), assiduously eschewed using on von Braun. Assassination?
Well those with pre-existing (or “subsequent”), health conditions can always quietly “shuffle-off” to no one’s alarm (like John Smith MP for instance #Bliar).
**Italics mine. Held to be pseudo-science by the particle-worshippers and gene-fiddlers.
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/3882920/viktor-schauberger-lust-for-lifeorg Nb. Download would not upload here.
Quote; “Viktor Schauberger was a genius whose ideas were far ahead of his time. He worked as a “forest-master” in the Austrian Alps when they were still a true wilderness. This experience was to influence his entire life’s work. Schauberger prophesied the environmental crises we are seeing today, predicting that unless we start to cherish rather than exploit our world, we would surely destroy ourselves. He demonstrated how deforestation would deplete the world of water, causing deserts and climatic chaos. Asked about our technology, “How else should it be done?” His answer was “exactly in the opposite way that it is done today!” His maxim: “Comprehend and Copy Nature!” From his precise observations of the processes of Nature, Schauberger pioneered a completely new understanding of the nature of water as the most important life-giving and energy-empowered substance on the planet. This led him to develop a radical new science which flew in the face of conventional scientific thinking but which, today, is being increasingly recognized for its highly-relevant implications for civilization. Viktor Schauberger might have made a career as a brilliant inventor. Forced, for a time, to develop radical new forms of propulsion for the Third Reich” https://pdfcoffee.com/viktor-schauberger-the-water-wizard-pdf-free.html 2
Nb. Caveat emptor…just remember the Men in Black/Majestic Twelve (et.al in the “Allied Powers” -incl. U.K-), have been deliberately; obfuscating, obscuring and occulting since before 1947. They have played the “conspiracy theory” card in order to survive, releasing just enough info to keep the “Alien Astronaut Theorists” going but never enough to convince the majority that the belief that our governments have researched and developed Schaubergian technology is anything more than fantastical wish-fulfilment.
Also see this recent publication (Nb. not a testimonial I have not read the work): https://www.amazon.com/Kennedys-Last-Stand-Eisenhower-Assassination/dp/0982290268 1, esp. quote attributed to Clinton.
Quote; "Jamie Theakston finally lifts-the-lid on the massive investment and research efforts by the NAZIs into areas of science virtually unknown to The Allies. The size and extent of the underground and overground facilities built in Eastern Europe by the Germans for these more occluded endeavours would actually appear to be greater than that they lavished on the more prosaic V-weapons. What is also very telling is the observation at the time (according to Theakston and a Polish researcher), of the appearance of, “more than a hundred” Allied secret service personnel at the site following its capture, the execution by the NAZIs of all the slave workers (who, “went there to die” according to Theakston), and that (again and again we are told -Paraphr-); “this was the most secret endeavour of the NAZI state”…!
What Theakston doesn’t cover is the philosophical bias inherent in Nazi science away from (as they saw it), the “Einsteinian relativism” of The Jews and towards a nuclear physics of their own, a “spin” that resulted in a concentration on electro-magnetism and fluid dynamics (technologies which were not pursued with anything like the same intensity or commitment by The Allies)." …
“Researcher and author Joseph P Farrell talks about his books, “Reich
of the Black Sun” and “The SS brotherhood of the Bell”. Topics
Highlighted: Joseph’s background, the black sun, the swastika, OSS,
Paperclip, NASA connection with the Nazis, underground bases, Hans
Kammler, Igor Witkowski, Wunderwaffe, crashed UFO, new physics, alchemy,
Mercury, The Apollo Program/Antarctica/nazi retreat to South America
and the similarities between the Nazi Bell and the acorn like craft that
went down in Kecksburg 1966”: https://www.arafel.co.uk/2015/09/forbidden-history-and-reich-of-black-sun.html
I ask you to use the search facilities (also and esp. re: HIV, AIDS, NAVS), to find these threads on 5Filters rather than giving you direct links because of their, "Covid sensitive" nature, the threads on, "Arafel" on this subject were, however, posted before the pandemic.
Today's post was prompted by two current BBC documentaries the first of which, "The Coming Storm" by Gabriel Gatehouse, has already been aired and represents a true neoliberal masterclass from the BBC World Service #FakeNews Team, quote; "A year on from the Capitol Insurrection in Washington DC on 6 January 2021, Gabriel Gatehouse journeys into the dark undergrowth of modern America. He's looking for the origins of the story that drove the crowds to storm the heart of US democracy. From conspiracy-soaked barrooms in 1990s Arkansas, via spies in hotel rooms in the shadow of the Kremlin, to anarchic chatrooms on the early internet, this is a search for the answer to one big question: did this just happen, or is somebody trying to break reality?" Go to: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0bc3rjy The second, "Forbidden America" from Louis Theroux, starting on BBC Two on Sunday 13 February that will, quote; "look at right-wing internet personalities, and how people use the internet and social media to push particular extremist views" would seem to be from the same school of condescending lobster-backs! Go to: https://www.nationalworld.com/culture/louis-therouxs-forbidden-america-release-date-trailer-and-how-to-watch-new-documentary-series-3560781
Anderson, an Avionics Technician is interviewed by Rob Balsamo,
Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Wayne reveals his observations of a
remote guidance test on a Boeing 757 in which technology was used to
control the aircraft remotely, while also being able to "Lockout" the
Flight Crew from overriding the autopilot system in order to regain
control of the airplane. The following interview discusses the details
of this test which was performed prior to September 11, 2001, the
violations of FAA regulations and the possibilities using such
technology." Go to: http://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/msg/archive/1512081442.html & http://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/msg/archive/1512033259.html , also see;
"The 9/11 Document that Launched US-NATO’s “War on Terrorism” in the Middle East" Go to: https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-frank-taylor-report-the-911-document-that-launched-us-natos-war-on-terrorism-in-the-middle-east/5632874?print=1
“It is not “openly debated”! For it to be openly debated the issue
would require television coverage. Has Attenborough mentioned it, has
any channel’s environment correspondent covered it? No… @BBCJustinR
Pls. see prev. #Geoengineering #chemtrails @Channel4News” https://twitter.com/Williamtheb/status/1537381853493174274
“If people are concerned a good (and caring), politician allays
such…the more people are kept in the dark the more they suspect (I also
think the #Chinese timed their statement deliberately but as you are clearly not a political animal that won’t carry any weight with you)!” https://twitter.com/Williamtheb/status/1537381853493174274"" Pls. see "5Filters" thread linked above.