Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Thursday, 2 May 2013
"Are Several of our Satellites Missing?"
Without information it is impossible to construct an argument...
Quote: "A new $273 million satellite designed to detect atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and in turn, aid in scientists’ understanding of the human impact on this atmospheric gas, has been lost in space. It was launched on Tuesday morning from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
This catastrophic loss comes on the heels of another recent space disaster – a collision between Russian and US satellites miles above the earth on February 11th.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite didn’t reach orbit after its 1:51 a.m. local time launch because the “payload fairing didn’t separate, NASA said in a statement. The fairing is a protective cover that surrounds the top of the satellite during launch and then is intended to separate from the main vehicle so the satellite can detach from its rocket boosters and enter regular orbit. For an unknown reason, the fairing failed to separate at the required time. The added weight of the fairing remaining attached prevented the rocket from obtaining the necessary elevation to reach stable orbit.
The spacecraft did not reach orbit and landed in the Pacific Ocean near Antarctica, said John Brunschwyler, the program manager for the Taurus XL.
“If it is lost, that is disappointing because it was giving us novel information to help us move our understanding forward on global warming,” said Alan O’Neill, science director of the Reading, U.K.-based Centre for Earth Observation.
The lost satellite was NASA’s first spacecraft dedicated to studying atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is the leading human-produced greenhouse gas believed to have a contribution to changes in Earth’s climate. It was hoped that this satellite would further refine scientists’ understanding of how much carbon dioxide is released by humans and how the atmosphere responds to this increase.
“The Orbiting Carbon Observatory’s carbon dioxide measurements will be pivotal in advancing our knowledge of virtually all Earth system land, atmosphere, and ocean processes,” said Michael Freilich, director of NASA’s Earth Science Division in Washington. ”They will play crucial roles in refining our knowledge of climate forcings and Earth’s response processes.” Go to meteorologynews.com
Quote: "An anonymous reader writes with news that the European Space Agency has lost contact with its Envisat environmental satellite mere weeks after celebrating a full decade in orbit. Engineers have spent the last month trying to re-establish contact, and will continue to do so for another two months. "With ten sophisticated sensors, Envisat has observed and monitored Earth’s land, atmosphere, oceans and ice caps during its ten-year lifetime, delivering over a thousand terabytes of data. An estimated 2500 scientific publications so far have been based on this information, furthering our knowledge of the planet." The ESA was hoping Envisat would stay operational for another two years, until Sentinel satellites from the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security initiative became operational."....and....
"New submitter crazyjj writes "As reported in Wired, a recent National Research Council report indicates a growing concern for NASA, the NOAA, and USGS. While there are currently 22 Earth-observing satellites in orbit, this number is expected to drop to as low as six by the year 2020. The U.S. relies on this network of satellites for weather forecasting, climate change data, and important geologic and oceanographic information. As with most things space and NASA these days, the root cause is funding cuts. The program to maintain this network was funded at $2 billion as recently as 2002, but has since been scaled back to a current funding level of $1.3 billion, with only two replacement satellites having definite launch dates."" Go to science.slashdot.org
Quote: "A NASA satellite that aimed to study the impact of aerosols on climate plunged into the Pacific Ocean on Friday, delivering a $424-million blow to the US space agency.
The failure of the Glory satellite launch was the second
bungle for NASA climate science efforts in two years, and closely
resembled a botched carbon satellite launch involving the same company,
Orbital Sciences Corp., in 2009.
Glory could not reach orbit after its protective clamshell-like nose cone cover failed to detach after launch, engineers said as they struggled to figure out why the expensive technology collapse had happened yet again.
"We are all pretty devastated," said Ron Grabe, executive vice president and general manager of the Virginia-based Orbital's Launch Systems Group, which made both the rocket and satellite.
Grabe appeared at a press conference Friday along with other grim-faced executives and NASA experts as the US space agency announced the creation of a "Mishap Investigation Board to evaluate the cause of the failure."
"We encountered no anomalies" early on, NASA launch director Omar Baez told reporters.
But a few minutes into the flight, it became apparent that separation of the cover, known as a fairing, had not occurred.
"We didn't see the indication of fairing separation," said Baez. "We failed to make orbit and all indications are that the satellite and rocket are in the southern Pacific Ocean somewhere."
The launch of the satellite -- which was to measure aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere to help clarify their impact on climate -- was delayed on February 23 after an unexpected ground control reading 15 minutes before liftoff.
On Friday it blasted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California aboard a four stage Taurus-XL rocket at 2:09 am (1009 GMT), but NASA soon reported that it was slowing down and would not reach orbit.
A similar mishap took place in February 2009, when a satellite designed to monitor global carbon dioxide emissions plummeted into the ocean near Antarctica after failing to reach orbit, in a setback for climate science.
There too, a fatal mission error occurred minutes after liftoff when the fairing, which protects the satellite during its ascent, failed to separate properly.
But experts said it was too early to know if the Glory failed for the exact same reason, and that more analysis was needed.
"Right now we are crunching the data but there is not enough data that has been processed to tell any more than the fairing did not deploy," said Rick Straka, deputy general manager at Orbital.
Grabe said engineers had done extensive research on the previous failure, and went so far as to completely change out the initiation system and replace it with another one that had flown successfully three times.
"So we really went into this flight feeling confident that we had nailed the fairing issue," said Grabe.
"There is a great deal of emotional investment on the part of all the players on any spaceflight but that is probably doubly so on a return-to-flight effort like this one," he said.
"We will recover. The team will bounce back. They are all professionals and Orbital Sciences will bounce back with the Taurus vehicle," said Grabe.
The satellite itself weighed 1,164 pounds (528 kilograms), and carried two main instruments, the Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor and the Total Irradiance Monitor which was to be directed at the Sun.
Glory was supposed to chart an orbital course 340 nautical miles (630 kilometers) above the Earth, before employing an on-board propulsion system to raise its orbit to 438 nautical miles (811 kilometers).
It was then supposed to join what is known as the "A-Train" of Earth-observing satellites sent up by NASA.
The five already there -- Aqua, Cloudsat, Calipso, Parasol and Aura -- fly in formation, crossing the equator every afternoon." Go to: http://phys.org/news/2011-03-earth-satellite-nasa.html
Quote: "A new $273 million satellite designed to detect atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and in turn, aid in scientists’ understanding of the human impact on this atmospheric gas, has been lost in space. It was launched on Tuesday morning from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
This catastrophic loss comes on the heels of another recent space disaster – a collision between Russian and US satellites miles above the earth on February 11th.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite didn’t reach orbit after its 1:51 a.m. local time launch because the “payload fairing didn’t separate, NASA said in a statement. The fairing is a protective cover that surrounds the top of the satellite during launch and then is intended to separate from the main vehicle so the satellite can detach from its rocket boosters and enter regular orbit. For an unknown reason, the fairing failed to separate at the required time. The added weight of the fairing remaining attached prevented the rocket from obtaining the necessary elevation to reach stable orbit.
The spacecraft did not reach orbit and landed in the Pacific Ocean near Antarctica, said John Brunschwyler, the program manager for the Taurus XL.
“If it is lost, that is disappointing because it was giving us novel information to help us move our understanding forward on global warming,” said Alan O’Neill, science director of the Reading, U.K.-based Centre for Earth Observation.
The lost satellite was NASA’s first spacecraft dedicated to studying atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is the leading human-produced greenhouse gas believed to have a contribution to changes in Earth’s climate. It was hoped that this satellite would further refine scientists’ understanding of how much carbon dioxide is released by humans and how the atmosphere responds to this increase.
“The Orbiting Carbon Observatory’s carbon dioxide measurements will be pivotal in advancing our knowledge of virtually all Earth system land, atmosphere, and ocean processes,” said Michael Freilich, director of NASA’s Earth Science Division in Washington. ”They will play crucial roles in refining our knowledge of climate forcings and Earth’s response processes.” Go to meteorologynews.com
Quote: "An anonymous reader writes with news that the European Space Agency has lost contact with its Envisat environmental satellite mere weeks after celebrating a full decade in orbit. Engineers have spent the last month trying to re-establish contact, and will continue to do so for another two months. "With ten sophisticated sensors, Envisat has observed and monitored Earth’s land, atmosphere, oceans and ice caps during its ten-year lifetime, delivering over a thousand terabytes of data. An estimated 2500 scientific publications so far have been based on this information, furthering our knowledge of the planet." The ESA was hoping Envisat would stay operational for another two years, until Sentinel satellites from the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security initiative became operational."....and....
"New submitter crazyjj writes "As reported in Wired, a recent National Research Council report indicates a growing concern for NASA, the NOAA, and USGS. While there are currently 22 Earth-observing satellites in orbit, this number is expected to drop to as low as six by the year 2020. The U.S. relies on this network of satellites for weather forecasting, climate change data, and important geologic and oceanographic information. As with most things space and NASA these days, the root cause is funding cuts. The program to maintain this network was funded at $2 billion as recently as 2002, but has since been scaled back to a current funding level of $1.3 billion, with only two replacement satellites having definite launch dates."" Go to science.slashdot.org
Quote: "A NASA satellite that aimed to study the impact of aerosols on climate plunged into the Pacific Ocean on Friday, delivering a $424-million blow to the US space agency.
Glory could not reach orbit after its protective clamshell-like nose cone cover failed to detach after launch, engineers said as they struggled to figure out why the expensive technology collapse had happened yet again.
"We are all pretty devastated," said Ron Grabe, executive vice president and general manager of the Virginia-based Orbital's Launch Systems Group, which made both the rocket and satellite.
Grabe appeared at a press conference Friday along with other grim-faced executives and NASA experts as the US space agency announced the creation of a "Mishap Investigation Board to evaluate the cause of the failure."
"We encountered no anomalies" early on, NASA launch director Omar Baez told reporters.
But a few minutes into the flight, it became apparent that separation of the cover, known as a fairing, had not occurred.
"We didn't see the indication of fairing separation," said Baez. "We failed to make orbit and all indications are that the satellite and rocket are in the southern Pacific Ocean somewhere."
The launch of the satellite -- which was to measure aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere to help clarify their impact on climate -- was delayed on February 23 after an unexpected ground control reading 15 minutes before liftoff.
On Friday it blasted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California aboard a four stage Taurus-XL rocket at 2:09 am (1009 GMT), but NASA soon reported that it was slowing down and would not reach orbit.
A similar mishap took place in February 2009, when a satellite designed to monitor global carbon dioxide emissions plummeted into the ocean near Antarctica after failing to reach orbit, in a setback for climate science.
There too, a fatal mission error occurred minutes after liftoff when the fairing, which protects the satellite during its ascent, failed to separate properly.
But experts said it was too early to know if the Glory failed for the exact same reason, and that more analysis was needed.
"Right now we are crunching the data but there is not enough data that has been processed to tell any more than the fairing did not deploy," said Rick Straka, deputy general manager at Orbital.
Grabe said engineers had done extensive research on the previous failure, and went so far as to completely change out the initiation system and replace it with another one that had flown successfully three times.
"So we really went into this flight feeling confident that we had nailed the fairing issue," said Grabe.
"There is a great deal of emotional investment on the part of all the players on any spaceflight but that is probably doubly so on a return-to-flight effort like this one," he said.
"We will recover. The team will bounce back. They are all professionals and Orbital Sciences will bounce back with the Taurus vehicle," said Grabe.
The satellite itself weighed 1,164 pounds (528 kilograms), and carried two main instruments, the Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor and the Total Irradiance Monitor which was to be directed at the Sun.
Glory was supposed to chart an orbital course 340 nautical miles (630 kilometers) above the Earth, before employing an on-board propulsion system to raise its orbit to 438 nautical miles (811 kilometers).
It was then supposed to join what is known as the "A-Train" of Earth-observing satellites sent up by NASA.
The five already there -- Aqua, Cloudsat, Calipso, Parasol and Aura -- fly in formation, crossing the equator every afternoon." Go to: http://phys.org/news/2011-03-earth-satellite-nasa.html
Thursday, 25 April 2013
Perfidious Albion
This "nation of shopkeepers" seldom fails to disappoint, take for instance the current headline making stories, the deportation of Abu Qatada and the threat of a measles epidemic. Virtually all the information we are currently being fed on either subject is false.
If Europe doesn't approve of the deportation of a terrorist in order to stand trial in his own country following a breach of British law surely it is not beyond the wit of someone from the foreign office to suggest that maybe one of the other European states might like to look after him for a while (or at least long enough for the Jordanian authorities to acquire some international credibility concerning their treatment of political prisoners)? The British Government however (and Theresa May and David Cameron in particular), are displaying real (and what would be comic if the issue were not so serious), desperation in their efforts to ensure that their "dirty linen" is not aired in public. They have now created an extraordinary public relations problem for their own administration whilst Abu Qatada is undoubtedly cackling in his beard with delight at the transparent posturing and abject failure of a ridiculous regime that will undoubtedly collude in the demonisation of two young wayward Chechens (whose acts will be decontextualised with no mention made of the back-stabbing behaviour of the Democrat administration that helped to create them -Mr.Clinton-).
The possible measles epidemic and the toxicity of the M.M.R jab are far worse problems however as they deal with the lives of innocents. If I were a parent today I would probably allow my child to be vaccinated and then institute a mercury detoxification protocol (knowledge is power after all), and although this is clearly not an ideal solution until such time as the medical and dental practitioners in Britain and America (the principle offenders in this regard), take their heads out of their a***holes concerning mercury toxicity (and shoving nasty chemical compounds into people generally), this deeply unsavoury and unsatisfactory state of affairs will continue (go to "Wicked Leeks" on this blog).
If Europe doesn't approve of the deportation of a terrorist in order to stand trial in his own country following a breach of British law surely it is not beyond the wit of someone from the foreign office to suggest that maybe one of the other European states might like to look after him for a while (or at least long enough for the Jordanian authorities to acquire some international credibility concerning their treatment of political prisoners)? The British Government however (and Theresa May and David Cameron in particular), are displaying real (and what would be comic if the issue were not so serious), desperation in their efforts to ensure that their "dirty linen" is not aired in public. They have now created an extraordinary public relations problem for their own administration whilst Abu Qatada is undoubtedly cackling in his beard with delight at the transparent posturing and abject failure of a ridiculous regime that will undoubtedly collude in the demonisation of two young wayward Chechens (whose acts will be decontextualised with no mention made of the back-stabbing behaviour of the Democrat administration that helped to create them -Mr.Clinton-).
The possible measles epidemic and the toxicity of the M.M.R jab are far worse problems however as they deal with the lives of innocents. If I were a parent today I would probably allow my child to be vaccinated and then institute a mercury detoxification protocol (knowledge is power after all), and although this is clearly not an ideal solution until such time as the medical and dental practitioners in Britain and America (the principle offenders in this regard), take their heads out of their a***holes concerning mercury toxicity (and shoving nasty chemical compounds into people generally), this deeply unsavoury and unsatisfactory state of affairs will continue (go to "Wicked Leeks" on this blog).
Saturday, 30 March 2013
The Crystal.org
Our future is built
on sustainable cities
Welcome to the Crystal,
London’s newest landmark building and the world’s first center dedicated
to improving our knowledge of urban sustainability.
Urban sustainability is
among the most critically important global issues of the 21st century.
Over half the world’s population live in urban areas - from small cities
like York, to megacities like New York - and by 2050 that proportion
will rise to 70% of all humanity.
The big challenge is that
cities now consume about 75% of all the world's energy and emit around
80% of all greenhouse gases. The fight against climate change will
therefore be won or lost in cities, so it's crucial we make our urban
habitats more efficient, cleaner and better to live in - not only for
ourselves, but for future generations and the earth's diverse
ecosystems.
From its vast interactive exhibition
to enlightening lectures and thought leadership conferences, the
Crystal aims to educate all of us about the technologies and solutions
that can help to improve urban life and sustainability.
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
"The European "Omerta.""
It just gets worse...Newsnight (say for instance), want some talking heads to discuss The European Union so they get economists, infact with a determination that Karl Marx himself might have admired such journalists and broadcasters invariably chose to consult...economists (however I doubt very much that Marx would have admired the economists they choose). It is "as if" we are no longer members of a society (a body politic perhaps but even that is now infected with the "Matrix-like" ability to transform all politicians into "economists"), for the social implications of any event or policy decision are desublimated to the economic realm. Nowhere is this more true than in the realm of foreign policy. "Bani Walid! Mustapha Leak!" (somewhere), but not on the BBC or any other domestic media in the U.K ("He'll be vague, ask for Hague!"). Unfortunately although the U.K population is now able to access good quality news broadcasting services from elsewhere in The World as never before (and the full effect on the U.K population of sudden exposure to broadcasters like, Max Keiser, Abby Martin or Thom Hartmann on Russia Today -"R.T"-, or the excellent documentaries on "Al Jazeera" -for instance-, cannot as yet be assessed), the "omerta" concerning discussion of the true nature of The Yugoslavian conflict and the economic, social and political consequences of "The Wider European Union" that is so rigidly adhered to and enforced by The European Media applies to R.T and Al Jazeera as-well (whose collusion indicates both the true extent of the omerta's influence and it's source). Russia's behaviour (and that of the westernised arab states), which is similar to that of America with regard to foreign and domestic policy dictates that such should be the case, for just as it is not in N.A.T.O's interest to encourage stability in the middle east it is not in Russia's to encourage the formation of an Eastern European economic and political community (whatever did happen to ours?), Russia's embrace of monetarist values and "laissez-faire" ensures that her foreign policy decisions are taken solely in order to maximise short term profits for a small group of people in just the same way as are those of the member states of N.A.T.O.
The degree of influence our desublimated politicians now have on The Market deconstructs laissez-faire but adds both energy and mass to the fiscal momentum generated by the acceptance of capitalism's "Manifest Destiny" (which process can of-course only take place following embrace of the concept).
I once visited Sicily (and mount Etna which promptly erupted), and it was noticeably quieter than any other European country I have ever visited.
In our current economic and political climate the market has almost generated sufficient power to silence dissent completely, untrammeled capitalism ("monetarism"), has facilitated the penetration of Socially Darwinistic surveillance into every aspect of our individual existences. What are "they" looking for? Do you keep it under your bed with your socialist sympathies or in the freezer with your "liberal" values?
Silence of this kind is bred by egocentrism, guilt and denial, plenty of which are on display when it comes to the constitutional issues which concern (and boy don't they!), the "Now Actively Treacherous Oligarchy" ("The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation" -clues in the title-). Talk about "above the titles" though! For both in the microcosm of this argument and the macrocosm of geo-politics The United Nations (supposedly the most powerful of all international institutions), plays understudy to N.A.T.O's fading matinee idol. The old studios and their retinue of ageing film stars, directors and producers clearly feel that their audience will now swallow more-or-less anything ("ZDT!" -"gezondheid!"-). Hitler described "the masses" as "sheep-like" and it seems that the Machiavellian "global" financial hegemony that manipulates institutions such as N.A.T.O believe this to be true of the electorates which provide the mandates for their facilitators. The lack of community values that infests The Darwinistic Society (an oxymoron that indicates the degree of thanotic inactivity occurring within the body politic), is endemic to cultures which have accepted that Capitalism's destiny is indeed "manifest". It is this contagion to which America's Aunt Sally has been over exposed, for not only does the U.K display the symptoms of acute monetarism but these are aggravated by her underlying chronic condition (something that even the most cursory examination of the content of our mainstream political, economic and social media confirms immediately). Take for instance a recent Daily Politics hosted by Andrew Neil, when affairs of the realm regarding the succession or similar issues were being discussed no mention was made what-so-ever of the arbitrary exclusion of all but the most mild (and secretive), of religious dissenters from the highest office in the land. This process is duplicated by the refusal of The British Labour Party to address the need for significant electoral reform and the failure of the other major political parties to properly consider the consequences of Scottish independence.
For those of us who were conscious during the process of the "Sophie's Choice" of a referendum on electoral reform that the post Yugoslavian Conflict British electorate were encouraged to accept as a true expression of their democratic freedoms the notion that a transcendent N.A.T.O does not control the economic, political and social direction of our country is ludicrous (is it not Mr.Ashdown?). Cameron dances the nationalist tune but he does not "pay-the-piper" yet whilst the anti-European lobby postures pro-Europeans (and this is true throughout Europe and beyond), simply refuse to accept the idea that "The European Adventure" has been hijacked by imperialist brigands whose ridiculous notion of a Wider Europe is as distasteful and disturbing as was Hitler's of Germania ("if you want to make a name for yourself in political journalism now-a-days all you have to do is mug a "Kr**t" !" -anon-), and as we have seen it is also in Putin's interest to attack European expansionism putatively, however, if he really wants to deter the west from extending it's influence all he has to do is hang a few more dead Chechens on the wire.
Silence (quite apart from being "golden" -"Maam"-), speaks volumes, in this case about the Mafiosi who are attempting to achieve dominance over the global market place. The poisonous hypocrisy of journalists, politicians, commentators and institutions with regard to these "constitutional difficulties" is somehow however a worse betrayal than is that of those who instigated or perpetuate them, those neo-conservatives and free-market liberals who have always worn their hearts on their sleeves seeming far less dangerous than those who claim impartiality or to have "no interests" whilst colluding in these conspiracies (or "conspiracy" the appearance of separateness being purely illusory).
It has become far too easy in Britain to simply indulge in crass sectarianism whenever one wishes to demonise dissent. The entropic slough that is the B.B.C has been indulging it's thanotic predilections with regard to these "constitutional issues" for years, there are no coincidences in nature and certainly Auntie's current behaviour brings a whole new meaning to the term "Savile Row".
If/when "The Gestapo" finally call for all the complacent "protestant" (a term which in this regard has far more to do with ones behaviour than the cut -or colour-, of ones cloth), poseurs who like to be seen as "the post-modern elite" (but are still awating the arrival of "The International"), I won't be there to say "I told you so" (and neither will many, many others), even commentators like Max Keiser who are well aware of the terrible crimes being perpetrated by our Utilitarian administrations, find it difficult to accept that "The Wider European Implosion" is now inevitable, it is however (as our transatlantic friends would have it), "time to wake up and smell the coffee" (before there ain't no croissants left)!
"Unsustainable Economy"? Just another way of expressing zero.
Friday, 4 January 2013
"The Threat to Amphibians"
"Boiling Frogs"!?
"So here it is "Merry Christmas"! Everybody's buying guns!"
Does anyone believe the P.t.Bs ("Powers that Be")? A simple list of "open-secrets" (many of which appear to have degenerated into mere "Urban Legends" -like "The Pentagon Papers" ?-), may give some insight into the true condition of our "market place";
1. "9/11"; manufactured by design or a function of The American Administration's new "default" setting? Following globalisation is there really a difference? Go to; http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/
2. Murder by Depleted Uranium? Fact. Kosova, Iraq (twice), Afghanistan (when necessary) and any possible future conflict with Iran, The Abrams, The Challenger and many other (so-called), "modern" weapons and munition systems would either simply not have been possible or (more importantly), economically viable to produce in large enough numbers without the use of depleted uranium.
3. Fukushima; the Japanese population (treated as "Unter-Menschen" by "Unclo Samo"), are "suffering in silence" (as far as the rest of The World is concerned), the consequences of having been stupid enough to attempt to alter the otherwise clearly Manifest Destiny of the dear old "U.S" of "A" (a nuclear research facility not on American soil? "What a convenience !").
4. The death of Osama Bin Laden? If we are to believe "Hillaryous Swankey" (give the girl an Oscar -"that is her isn't it?-), he went to a watery grave in The Indian Ocean at the hand of The Obama Administration (which let's face it doesn't really "have-the-b**ls" for "face-to-face" combat but can easily dispose of some unsightly human remains -if you happen to leave them lying around-, go to: http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/whats-that-coming-over-hill.html ).
Pots and Kettles ?
What about the U.K, America's creepy "yes man"?
1. The murder of Diana Spencer; there is far too much evidence that points to a major conspiracy involving both the British, French and other more global and far less accountable organisations/institutions to let the matter rest where it currently does.
2. Lockerbie, a conspiracy? One becomes even more convinced of the involvement of "The Home Powers" (Britain and America), when one witnesses the amount of what can only be described as "under-carpet sweeping" that has accompanied N.A.T.Os involvement in Libya ("N.A.T.O" = "Now Actively Treacherous Oligarchy"?).
3. The Mull of Kintyre? What did happen? I'm moved to quote both Holmes and Occam concerning this Gordian Knot, for having dismissed "the possible" ones' "improbable" conclusion is that the death of many of Britain's top (at least in terms of "The Irish Campaign"), military and security service personnel was at the end of a very "long-knife" indeed, reaching (as it must have), all the way from the (again), dear old "U.S". of "A".
Quote: "the Mull houses a secretive military facility that is home to a unit of US Navy SEALS, a top-grade Commando force associated with "black operations," including assassination" Go to: "Deep Black Lies": http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/the_mystery_of_flight_zulu_delta.htm
4. The Channel Tunnel? (go to; http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/has-integrity-of-channel-tunnel-always.html)
Collusion?
America, Britain (and in all likelihood), Russia, France and China (an order suggested by the probable chronology of each state's development of the technology concerned and a list that might well have begun to include Germany -again-, in recent years), know the true story of American Admiral Richard.E.Byrd's expeditions to Antarctica post 1945 and the nature of the N.A.Z.I research that the cover-up surrounding these "visitations" has been designed to conceal (go to: http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/dark-matters-also-re-channel-tunnel.html also see; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8180528/Wikileaks-new-diplomatic-cables-contain-UFO-details-says-Julian-Assange.html )
"The Boys from Brazil" ?
With reference again to the consequences of "Project Paper-clip" (America's operation to gather unto itself all the useful researchers and viable technologies of The Third Reich before the fragmentation of Germany prior to and just following the end of World War Two in Europe), few have examined (apart perhaps from Lawrence Olivier and Gregory Peck), the evidence concerning the nature and tenor of the eugenics research that was absorbed by America during this process. Should one be in a position to "see-the-wood-for-the-trees" regarding the consequences of the aforementioned process of absorbtion one may feel moved to ask "Did The Third Reich Continue or The Fourth Reich Commence? : Discuss" (go to; http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/wicked-leeks.html -esp. re; A.I.D.S-)
Health Effects?
The most "open" (and therefore dangerous), secrets of all are the day-today "realpolitik" consequences of these and many, many other of our current administrations policies ("smells worse than a pile of fish in the middle of Manhattan" -and in case you don't believe us they've just delivered one-), such as; A.I.D.S, the asbestosis of 9/11 survivors, the children of Fullujah, Fukushima, Bhopal, the spread of more dangerous viruses, bacteria and fungi and the real cost of mobile-phone and other "wire-less" technologies. However above and beyond all of these is the perversion of science that "modern" man choses to call "particle beam research"*, "imagine you have two watches and you want to find out how they work so you smash them together and examine what remains" (to paraphrase one noted physicist). "Examine what remains?!" it never occurred to anyone to invent a screwdriver !?" (also see; "Dark Matters" -above-).
*Very few realise that military research in the aforementioned countries (see "Collusion?"), into particle beam weapons has been going on for decades (far longer than the extant "civil" research that now makes starry-eyed the acolytes of quantum physicists in science faculties throughout The World -whose lack of understanding is infact belied by the economic consequences of their actions, both in theory and practice-).
"So here it is "Merry Christmas"! Everybody's buying guns!"
Does anyone believe the P.t.Bs ("Powers that Be")? A simple list of "open-secrets" (many of which appear to have degenerated into mere "Urban Legends" -like "The Pentagon Papers" ?-), may give some insight into the true condition of our "market place";
1. "9/11"; manufactured by design or a function of The American Administration's new "default" setting? Following globalisation is there really a difference? Go to; http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/
2. Murder by Depleted Uranium? Fact. Kosova, Iraq (twice), Afghanistan (when necessary) and any possible future conflict with Iran, The Abrams, The Challenger and many other (so-called), "modern" weapons and munition systems would either simply not have been possible or (more importantly), economically viable to produce in large enough numbers without the use of depleted uranium.
3. Fukushima; the Japanese population (treated as "Unter-Menschen" by "Unclo Samo"), are "suffering in silence" (as far as the rest of The World is concerned), the consequences of having been stupid enough to attempt to alter the otherwise clearly Manifest Destiny of the dear old "U.S" of "A" (a nuclear research facility not on American soil? "What a convenience !").
4. The death of Osama Bin Laden? If we are to believe "Hillaryous Swankey" (give the girl an Oscar -"that is her isn't it?-), he went to a watery grave in The Indian Ocean at the hand of The Obama Administration (which let's face it doesn't really "have-the-b**ls" for "face-to-face" combat but can easily dispose of some unsightly human remains -if you happen to leave them lying around-, go to: http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/whats-that-coming-over-hill.html ).
Pots and Kettles ?
What about the U.K, America's creepy "yes man"?
1. The murder of Diana Spencer; there is far too much evidence that points to a major conspiracy involving both the British, French and other more global and far less accountable organisations/institutions to let the matter rest where it currently does.
2. Lockerbie, a conspiracy? One becomes even more convinced of the involvement of "The Home Powers" (Britain and America), when one witnesses the amount of what can only be described as "under-carpet sweeping" that has accompanied N.A.T.Os involvement in Libya ("N.A.T.O" = "Now Actively Treacherous Oligarchy"?).
3. The Mull of Kintyre? What did happen? I'm moved to quote both Holmes and Occam concerning this Gordian Knot, for having dismissed "the possible" ones' "improbable" conclusion is that the death of many of Britain's top (at least in terms of "The Irish Campaign"), military and security service personnel was at the end of a very "long-knife" indeed, reaching (as it must have), all the way from the (again), dear old "U.S". of "A".
Quote: "the Mull houses a secretive military facility that is home to a unit of US Navy SEALS, a top-grade Commando force associated with "black operations," including assassination" Go to: "Deep Black Lies": http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/the_mystery_of_flight_zulu_delta.htm
4. The Channel Tunnel? (go to; http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/has-integrity-of-channel-tunnel-always.html)
Collusion?
America, Britain (and in all likelihood), Russia, France and China (an order suggested by the probable chronology of each state's development of the technology concerned and a list that might well have begun to include Germany -again-, in recent years), know the true story of American Admiral Richard.E.Byrd's expeditions to Antarctica post 1945 and the nature of the N.A.Z.I research that the cover-up surrounding these "visitations" has been designed to conceal (go to: http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/dark-matters-also-re-channel-tunnel.html also see; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8180528/Wikileaks-new-diplomatic-cables-contain-UFO-details-says-Julian-Assange.html )
"The Boys from Brazil" ?
With reference again to the consequences of "Project Paper-clip" (America's operation to gather unto itself all the useful researchers and viable technologies of The Third Reich before the fragmentation of Germany prior to and just following the end of World War Two in Europe), few have examined (apart perhaps from Lawrence Olivier and Gregory Peck), the evidence concerning the nature and tenor of the eugenics research that was absorbed by America during this process. Should one be in a position to "see-the-wood-for-the-trees" regarding the consequences of the aforementioned process of absorbtion one may feel moved to ask "Did The Third Reich Continue or The Fourth Reich Commence? : Discuss" (go to; http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/wicked-leeks.html -esp. re; A.I.D.S-)
Health Effects?
The most "open" (and therefore dangerous), secrets of all are the day-today "realpolitik" consequences of these and many, many other of our current administrations policies ("smells worse than a pile of fish in the middle of Manhattan" -and in case you don't believe us they've just delivered one-), such as; A.I.D.S, the asbestosis of 9/11 survivors, the children of Fullujah, Fukushima, Bhopal, the spread of more dangerous viruses, bacteria and fungi and the real cost of mobile-phone and other "wire-less" technologies. However above and beyond all of these is the perversion of science that "modern" man choses to call "particle beam research"*, "imagine you have two watches and you want to find out how they work so you smash them together and examine what remains" (to paraphrase one noted physicist). "Examine what remains?!" it never occurred to anyone to invent a screwdriver !?" (also see; "Dark Matters" -above-).
*Very few realise that military research in the aforementioned countries (see "Collusion?"), into particle beam weapons has been going on for decades (far longer than the extant "civil" research that now makes starry-eyed the acolytes of quantum physicists in science faculties throughout The World -whose lack of understanding is infact belied by the economic consequences of their actions, both in theory and practice-).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)