Friday 25 May 2012

Dark Matters (also re: channel tunnel)

or..."Particle Beam Physics/Weapons an Intelligence Black Hole?"

Quote: "Concerned by notions of displacement theory (study the geology of landslides) and the possible collapse of part of The Canary Islands, I applied the notion of displacement to the theory of particle beam accelerators. Now this may be a giant leap for mankind but if you have an understanding of temporal physics alarm bells could be ringing already. In an effort to justify my suspicions I performed some cursory searches. I did find one guy Steven J Smith (who I'm sure his probable ex-colleagues consider to be "whacko") who seems at least to have become disturbed enough by the goings on at places like Montauk Point (go to and Ed's Note: These are the only two web pages currently unnavigable from my threads -Edit 14/12/10-) and the Nuclear (anything) vs Seismology debate to be raising some alarm.
Some of you here may have far greater knowledge of the military applications of particle beam weapons (and yes when I searched via Google -ha- for "The Real X-Files" this is exactly what I found) and their intelligence profile. I ask however is it possible that so-called "civil" research using particle beam accelerators may be far more dangerous? Need to collate and circulate so please post anything you feel may be pertinent because it may just be a feeling but is there a black hole in our intelligence?

Steven J states here;
" Quote 3:
RHIC ions are so small that, even at nearly the speed of light, the force of their impact is about the same as the impact of two mosquitos colliding.

From the BNL website, we discover that gold (Au) atoms are used for the particle beam. .....3.2.2
Particle beam energy calculations:
The energy contained in any moving object, be it a car, snow ball, or particle beam composed of gold atoms is calculated as follows:

[Eq. 1]

E = Energy in Joules.
M = Mass in kilograms.
V = Velocity in meters per second.

The mass of a gold atom is 3.2697-21 grams, and the mass of 2 billion gold atoms is 6.5394-12 grams or 6.5394-15 kilograms. Thanks to Einstein's relativity, the effective mass of any object traveling near the speed of light increases by:

[Eq. 2]

At 99.995% of light speed, the effective mass is slightly more than 100 times the rest mass, therefore our 2 billion gold atoms have an effective mass of 6.5394-13 kilograms. Next, the speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum, and 99.995% of light speed is 299,777,468 meters per second. Therefore:

E = 6.5394-13 * 299,777,4862 * 0.5 = 29383.7 Joules

And since the RHIC stores 57 "bunches" or packets of particles, the total energy is: 57 * 29383.7 = 1,674,871 Joules. This is nearly 3 times the energy of a 3500 pound automobile crashing into a wall at 60 miles per hour! And all of this energy concentrated into 57 packages, each smaller than the period at the end of this sentence, AND traveling at nearly the speed of light.

It seems quote number 3 (above) tells the truth, but NOT the whole truth..."

Any incremental advances in power will surely "massively" change the factors in Einstein's equation. Now also given that we know the European Particle Beam Accelerator has been out of action, because (so I believe) the binding for the ring has been breaking, is this indicative of the massive (otherwise "incremental") changes taking place within the accelerator? (Harwell Science and Innovation Campus)

"Plasma Beam Accelerator Development.
The emergence of ASTRA-GEMINI, the development of higher intensity sources via OPCPA, and the opportunity for co-location of major CLF facilities with DIAMOND open up the potential for truly significant advances in plasma-based particle accelerator research into the multi-GeV regime, as well as the ability to explore novel experiments coupling laser and conventional accelerator sources. Such work is important both for the development of next-generation light sources (for the physics, chemistry and bioscience communities), and to contribute to options for the High Energy Physics community. STFC is in an ideal position to provide leadership and balance in this area, combining work in the CLF and ASTeC as part of a strong UK effort."

Note: All research specified by acronym only.

What I have now found is this (may I draw the reader's special attention to the stuff on Schauberger and Tesla) follows: 

"Viktor Schauberger (1885-1958) made an extraordinary contribution to knowledge of the natural world.

He intuited what we now recognise as the quantum or subtle energy effects of water. His understanding was built up from shamanic and experiential observation of Nature in the untamed Alpine wilderness. His motto: "Observe and Copy Nature".

He was critical of textbook theory and the arrogance and lack of imagination of 'experts' and refused to go to college, believing that he would lose his intuitive gifts.

Schauberger was also gifted with engineering skills which are apparent in his environment-friendly technology and implosive energy devices designed to release people from enslavement to destructive sources of energy.

He is celebrated for his discoveries in the water sciences, in agricultural techniques and in the energy domain – which energies enhance and which harm life.

Schauberger provides us with a comprehensive and holistic approach to understanding Nature. His insights form the foundations of what might be called a 'science of Nature'.

He found two forms of motion in Nature: outward, expanding flow that is used to break down, and inward-spiralling which Nature uses to build up and energise. We use the first to generate energy, which is why it is destructive to the environment.

Minute changes in temperature affect the outcome of an energetic process. The balance between the attraction and repulsion of polarised atoms is the engine of creation.

Viktor Schauberger vividly described how our disdain for Nature's ways will bring only environmental catastrophe.

His vision - humanity working within Nature's laws - is the path we must rediscover, if we are to survive."

Shades of Nobel? (go to: )



Information has come into the public's attention which suggests that Lockheed has been working in the "black" on a discoid-shaped aircraft. Not only does this aircraft utilise anti-gravitic propulsion, but the discs are believed to be equipped with highly advanced particle beam weaponry.

Lockheed does hold the patents on disc-shaped passenger aicraft, so it is not unreasonable to assume they have also (successfully) investigated the possibility of creating such craft as military platforms.

Colonel Steve Wilson, USAF (deceased) stated that black military astronauts trained at a secret aerospace academy and later would operate out of Beale and Vandenberg Air Force Bases in California.

From those bases, these military astronauts regularly fly trans-atmospherically and out into space. One of the aerospace craft they use, Colonel Wilson reported, is the X-22A, Lockheed's two-man anti-gravity disc craft.

Evidence for the existence of the X-22A first came to light during Operation Desert Storm when American soldiers (and most likely Iraqi soldiers as well) made sightings of disc-shaped craft in the desert hovering near to U.S. officers. People also made claims of seeing these craft fire intense beams of light that removed any trace of what previously sat at the location, apart from a circular charcoal-like burn mark on the ground.

A Desert Storm soldier stated the following: "In the first days film footage and especially Video-cams which a large number of G.I.s had were impounded so they wouldn`t capture any sensitive material."

Dr. Richard Boylan states the following about the X-22A:

"The described disc was clearly an antigravity levitating aerial weapons platform in the U.S. arsenal, possibly a Lockheed X-22A two-man discoid craft, the real DarkStar, (of which the unmanned drone X-22 DarkStar is a front "cover" aircraft program to disguise this manned antigravity fighter disc.) Further, it appears that the real DarkStar manned discs come equipped with the latest Neutral Particle Beam weapons, which take apart the target at the molecular level. ET craft do not incinerate humans. Only human military fighters are so deployed. So this report does not deal with any extraterrestrial event.

It has been said that if the American people knew what the military had in their arsenal today, they wouldn't believe it, and would think someone was fantasizing about a Lucas Star Wars movie episode."

Dr. Richard Boylan:

reply posted on 24-7-2004 @ 01:52 PM by Echtelion

The craziest thing is that Nikola Tesla had experimented on a technology that can stimulate or alter EM fields in order to lift objects that are equipped with a an energy magnifying coil, thus cheating gravity by electromagnetic power. I don't know if the experiment worked, but as with most of Tesla's experiments, the theory was there, but the proper technology and financial support was'nt

That would quite give credit to the claims that the Nazis have experimented on aircrafts that broke the laws of gravity (foo fighters)... Just as they recycled De Gaulle's military tactics from England's and France`s dumpsters, they might very well have recycled Tesla's theories that were left aside by the American scientific community... So when the Nazis got beaten and german scientists where saved from the Nuremberg trials by the US Army, the whole research project was moved to the US, behind closed doors, in some military bases in southwestern USA, where further research was greelighted and given full financial and military support by black governmental projects.

Think about it... Why is it the government would lie, hide or stay silent about the UFO phenomenon? Is it really for that clich� reason to not create "mass hysteria", or would it be for an even more obvious reason... that they just don't want the public to know about the SECRET technology that they're experimenting???

And all that stuff about aliens would turn out to be the produce of a massive propaganda campaing, to keep the public's attention away from a truth that is just a few yards away from the alien theory... that the government has this futuristic technology, and had it for decades!

Yet another one of these techonologies ripped off from that poor genius Tesla... "


and these....

Report on advanced particle beam weapons technology for British Government.full.rar [HIGHSPEED DOWNLOAD]
[COMPLETE] dulce report 4
Report on advanced particle beam weapons technology for British Government [HIGHSPEED]
dulce report 4 [TRUSTED DOWNLOAD]
[DIRECT DOWNLOAD] Report on advanced particle beam weapons technology for British Government

...recommended YouTube on Tesla (including interesting segment on particle beam weapons) ...

Check out Admiral Richard E Byrd and "Operation Highjump"......

..oh..and this one... (for the sake of the memory of Adolph Galland and his friends)....

Perhaps we should consider the gravity of the situation?

"Teslic" notions of higher frequency photonic vibration may free us from (what I consider may be) our "Thanotic" view of gravity, if time is truly a continuum our autocratic conception of Chronos must be altered.....

BBC Radio4 Wedneday 3rd March 2010

"More than a year after Big Bang Day, Geoff Watts visits CERN in Geneva to discover what the last year has held for the Large Hadron Collider and the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken.

After the fanfare of the first switch-on of the so-called Big Bang Machine back in September 2008, and the subsequent breakdown, what has been happening in the intervening months? Are scientists now finally ready to start probing some of the great unanswered questions about the universe, and is the largest machine ever built finally ready to take on the challenge?"


The Hadron Collider now "rampted up" to 1720 power converters oe high-current.

Quote..."If it's not the Higg's it might be something else, we shall see."
(This from more than one member of the senior staff at CERN)....and...
"There must be something coming out there!!"
"It may be something different"
"We would like to find something we haven't thought of."

On the "Horizon" last night (see documentaries) what could we observe? "Dark Flow", this apparent abundance of "Thanotic Energy" is mirroring current research. It is completely irrisponsible to continue the CERN HADRON research (at this time or any-other) we've learned to use magnets, what's next guys the wheel ???!!!

If I were to say "they don't know what they are doing", one could hardly call it slander or libel (see above)!

Quote... "astrotometry Re: Urgent HADRON Re: Urgent HADRON
May I posit that we are witnessing the evidence of the precursic mechanism of what one might term a "Teslic Cascade" (I believe that if we touch the "halo" or "event horizon" of this gravitational phemomena we may well be unable to control the resulting acceleration*)?" From my YouTube account to "astrotometry".

* If "Inflation" is valid why isn't "Deflation"?

In support of the above I direct the reader's attention to the Newtonian notion of "equal and opposite reaction" (this "closes the circle" on the Newtonian debate and locates Gravity in it's proper place).
With reference to universal microwave background radiation theory it is clearly asinine to refer to variations in background radiation as only "tiny"* when the parameters of the "playing field" are infinite.
If I understand Dr.Kashlinksky the fact that (according to our notions of time where radiation is the chronometer), there is any variation at all must be suggestive of the true profoundity of his observations. The existence of Prof.Hawking's "singularities" would seem to be confirmed by Dr.Kashlinksy's findings for they suggest that the continuum (or "Astrotome"), is variable at these "network-hubs" (in other words time is not necessarily a constant).

*For are they not both "great and small"?

to "astrotometry

astrotometry Re: HAARP.
Yes but is not this obvious correlation evidential of the higher frequency "Teslic" astrotometric photonic vibrations manifesting?"

go to....

"Dark Flo'"..
(don't tell Doogal !!!!!!!!)
If I were to say "momentum" would you leap aboard the juggernaut?

The author does note that the CERN HADRON particle beam accelerator was switched back on yesterday Wednesday 31st March 2010. I would like to ask the CERN team why the media and public were told that the team were searching for "the fundamental particle" (the so-called "Higgs-Boson") and now they say that they don't know what they are looking for? What are they hiding (surely there must be something important that they are not telling us)?

How though do we create order from this Khaos*?
We will require different and more sensitive instruments. May I suggest that the application of water-molecule clustering theory** and the electron-microscopy of Dr. Masaru Emoto (when integrated synergistically into current theory and practice) may help reveal much more about the nature of The Universe than we are currently capable of observing?

*"cha·os (ks)
1. A condition or place of great disorder or confusion.
2. A disorderly mass; a jumble: The desk was a chaos of papers and unopened letters.
3. often Chaos The disordered state of unformed matter and infinite space supposed in some cosmogonic views to have existed before the ordered universe.
4. Mathematics A dynamical system that has a sensitive dependence on its initial conditions.
5. Obsolete An abyss; a chasm.

[Middle English, formless primordial space, from Latin, from Greek khaos.]" From "definition of Chaos from the Free Online Dictionary".

**/"Vibrational Resonance Theory" generally.

Yesterday I suggested to some fellow researchers that Bose-Einsteinian Theory (such as "Condensation") may help us better understand the "halonic phenomena" to which I refer.
One can only ask oneself "what was I thinking?"*

go to...

*I am! Quote:

"To calculate the transition temperature at any density, integrate over all momentum states* the expression for maximum number of excited particles...." from the Wikipedia definition, url given above.

*Under-score mine.

Whilst perhaps forgiving the nature of my calculus one can at least follow my reasoning, reasoning which seems to be leading us to the conclusion that "Erotic Energy Theory" is correct and that these matters are imminent.......

With regard to the issue of disclosure, which is an intimate partner in this debate, I find it instructive that recent U.S government files and archives have revealled a substantial programme of psychological/mind control experiments on ususpecting patients abducted from mental health institutions in the U.S during the 60s and 70s. If we dovetail this information into "Roswell Conspiracy Theory" (re: Chris Carter, Frank Spotnitz*; which states that there has been an international conspiracy (instigated by the U.S) to occlude "Coanda Effect" and other technolgies via a prcocess of "alien obfuscation", the suspicion begins to form that the whole "abductee" conspiracy is another example of the American Government utlising "The Roswell Effect" to occlude it's own (completely indefensible) research on it's own population.
Choking back our bile and disgust we might ask, "what were these experiments designed to achieve?!"

*(Edit 02/06/10 Futhermore, as one examines "The Real X-Files" one realises that we are in the same position as our wiley opponent in that we "cannot see the wood for the trees".)

It seems that Nikola Tesla may have given us that most precious of gifts "new eyes with which to see". His notion of "higher photonic vibration" (when applied) confirms the evidence of our senses and allows us to view things as they truly are (in certain dimensions).

Par Example Oblique

Consider Prof. Fred Hoyle's "Steady State".
"What nonsense" they now all cry (the "Know Everythings") but do they really understand dimensional physics?
You see if we examine the measurable parameters of the observable universe with all our current conventional instruments we conclude that the universe "expanded into existence" from a universal centre (re: Steven Hawking), however we are left with the question "expanded from what into what?" (locate "Expansion Theory" here)
If we examine Hoyle we find that he posits the notion of a "Steady State" Universe with no centre. What therefore accounts for Hubble's observations of acceleration in Hoyle's model? Answer; the universe may expand and contract but it must do so universally such that all matter (and light ?) is in a constant state of "Eros" or "Thanatos"*.
What is important here is the position of the conscious observer. There is an intimate relationship between how we observe and what we observe, however we should never mistake one for the other, if we do not instead of mere reproduction we find an opposite, a point of attraction, a mirror.

*These notions do not appear to be contradictory to those of the standard model, however gravity seems an arbitrary "player" in the game (we cannot locate it) and Hoyle's notions of "the eternal constant" are truly problematic, that said I'd hate to watch Fred Hoyle's baby "go down the plug-hole"!

I find the initial notion of dimensional relativity to be peculiarly interesting and am also instructed by the apparent marked reluctance of many who proselytise for the standard model to persue alternative lines of reasoning with regard to such cosmology.

Pulsars.....can be informative....

..."This information will cease to be recordable coincident with it's assimilation"?

Also...."That which inflates must deflate!"........eventually

A student rushes in to Fred Hoyle's office one day and says, "Fred! Fred! Have you heard of the "Big Bang Theory"?".
Fred Hoyle looks slowly up from his book, regards the student carefully and after a while smiles says "No" and goes back to his reading.*

Acceleration and decceleration, which way round are they in our revised model?

Must I say "Mobius Strip"?

(More from "The-Men in-Black" )

(NB. I intend to update my links to "Astrotometry" regularly on this thread as I believe that this information belongs to everyone and I encourage others to make their friends, family, collegues -and enemies?- aware of his work.... )

*I do trust by now that the serious researcher has "got the point"; no sound*=no expression and no expression=no dimension, seems obvious does it not?**

*Also the term "sound" here is to be understood to mean harmonic vibration of any kind (as discordance is Khaos and tends to destruction it is essentially "Thanotic" and does not partake of this discussion).
**See Edit 29/06/10 below.

"The Big Bang" may-be the greatest misnomer (and mistake?) in human history.

Viewers of "Atom" the other night will have seen and heard a description of "Quantum Foam" (and been made aware of Dr.Jim Khalili's deep desquiet about the nature of some current atomic theories). I believe my "Steady State Nonsense" above (with esp. reference to the notion of "Erotic" and "Thanotic" energy) represents a fairly well-brewed foamy beverage (if I say so me-self!).

from Sandtrout2010 to Astrotometry;
Quote......"The Channel Tunnel ?!"
Quote... "Comet R1 McNaught ("astrologomy")."
"Correct orientation (visible from my apartment) early hours of morning this week (esp. 13th 14th 15th), in an arc across the northen sky as "Auriga" (and it's bright star "Capella") begin to rise above the horizon (Edit 31/10/10: not setting as previously stated).*
*"Auriga" was the constellation of "The Goddess of the Silver Wheel" ("Arianrhod") in the Brethonic tradition."

Quote...."Comet McNaught.
In the early hours of the morning this month, binoculars should help you spot a comet. During June, Comet McNaught passes low in the north-east through the constellations of, first, Andromeda,then Perseus and finally through Auriga. By the beginning of June it should have reached magnitude 8, so will be fairly obvious in binoculars. On the 1st, it will lie just below and to the left of the star Beta Andromedae. This star is on the "star hop" route to M31: starting at the top left star (Alpha Andromedae) of the Square of Pegasus, go left and a touch down to a star and then continue left by the same amount but a touch up to reach Beta Andromedae. Here one normally turns sharp right past one star to get to M31, but instead just drop below Beta Andromedae to find the comet appearing as a "fuzzy" object. By the 7th it will be just below the star Gamma Andromedae whilst on the 15th it will be very close to the star Delta Persei. On the 21st it will be just up and to the right of the bright star Capella, Alpha Aurigae, and, on the 25th, very close and just to upper left of Beta Aurigae. This gives you 5 mornings when it should be very easy to find! By month's end it may well have reached magnitude 6, but will be increasing lost in the morning twilight. Probably the best time to observe it will be around the 14th, 15th and 16th of June when there will be no moonlight and it is still reasonably high in the sky."


I should here point out to my readers that I can actually see the vulgar causeway that is all that remains of Twyford Down from my second floor window (also the Northam Bridge and the tidal reaches of The River Itchen).
Comet R1 McNaught will describe an arc over "The Twyford Cutting" from N/NE to N/NW during this period.*

*I have since moved up and away from the banks of The River Itchen.

"Of-course !"

Quote: to "Astrotometry" from "Sandtrout2010"
"They are "Harbingers" aren't they? Re; Comet R1 McNaught...."

Quote from: "For Welfare to Work?" by Williamtheb on this forum....(Edit: 01/02/10)

"This gets very interesting if one is sympathetic to the notion of the possible existence of conciousness which is not exclusively homosapienic.
Clearly if it is possible to transform our global market place "organically" such that our economic philosophy becomes one of sustainability in "dynamic harmony" with the environment which supports it (which Gaian philosophy maintains is a state of consciousness*), we may be able to attribute sentience to it; however if we do so is it really a "market" anymore or has it changed it's nature completely during the transition from Thanatos to Eros?

*I also refer the reader to the work of Theilard de Chardin and his pre-Lovelockian/Schumachian notions of "planetary consciousness". Go to

One can see the transformation of economic relationships entailed as the emergence* of life from death (much like the Yew tree seeds itself in it's own rotting bark).
*"Emergence Theory"..go to

It is perhaps easier to understand this process by considering the resource base, an "unsustainable economy" is clearly an oxymoronic concept; in other words by consuming itself it partakes only of Thanatos and is (essentially) dead."

(Edit 29/06/10 My intended insistence on logical* progression was not borne out in my previous comments -I was in essence illogical-. Without expression there can be no dimension not the other way around as I had formerly stated**.)
* The original meaning of "Logos" (as not just "a" word but "The" word such as: "Ogham", "The Pranava" -or "Om"- and other such terms which either named or expressed the "primal creative sound" - got to - ) has been lost and as a result the term "logic" is now much abused.

** If it is not true to say that it is neccessary for "full expression" in order for one to be able to identify the existence of a dimension then I am (at least in my insistence that one preceed the other and that they are not simply inter-changeable terms -in other words both essentially the same but expressed differently-) wrong.

"Erotiscised energy resolves quantum"

(Edit 13/07/10 given the comments below concerning "solid matter" I was forced to alter my original statement "erotiscised matter resolves quantum" to "erotiscised energy resolves quantum")

Strangely it seems a "Unified Theory" of the Universe (or far more accurately I believe a "resolution of quantum") will be just that; a synergism* fused from the theories of the great "erotiscists" of physics and the recognition of the human evolutionary process.

*"Apparent" or otherwise?


Problems arise when instead of trying to harmonise with nature man tries to replicate it.

The yogis and mystics of the world have always believed that there is, quote; "no such thing as solid matter" Muz Murray ( -see link given above- is Muz Murray's site -I especially refer readers to Muz's experiences with Dr. Hans Jenny in Switzerland and Dr.Jenny's work on: yantras and chaldni figures, go to - this work informs the notion of the existence of "pre-forms" in the ether a theory also supported by the "photographic" evidence produced by the utilisation of the "Kirlian" technique, go to ). Where the notions of "Eros" and "Thanatos" are helpful is in identifying the nature of the vibrations which inform these manifestations.

Astrotometry update:

..and as a response "astrotometrically" (ipso facto must half not be ?). "A year and a day"? Still d**n far away..! ("yes look, these are small, those are.........far away........."). I say this because (sadly) my own ambition to produce working Brethonic Emephemarides (Edit 30/11/10, based on the pre-pythagorian* Brethonic/; astrotometry, geometry, astrology, astronomy (NB With regard to Brethonic astronomy I also refer the reader to my "astrologomal" comments on my thread "What's That Coming Over the Hill?") and geomancy has so far been thwarted.

* Reference James Vogh's comments on The Pythagorian Brotherhood in his book "The Thirteenth Sign".

"Tiger! Tiger!"

To follow Simon Bovey's "Slipstream" check the link given above.

Re: Susan Watts Newsnight 23/07/10 "Tevatron" interview (go to -there is nothing yet on Susan Watt's blog concerning the interview, go to -). Why does "Erotic Energy Theory" suggest that there is no way the Tevatron is going to answer "The God Particle" question?

From, quote: "Now, let’s see if the mainstream media can start to distinguish “power” from “energy”! After all, power is total energy per unit time. All you need to do to get more power is to put more particles into the machine…the Tevatron, by this measure, is still far more powerful, with many thousands of times more particles per beam. And there are much lower-energy machines with higher total beam power. In fact it will be a while before the LHC becomes “the world’s most powerful accelerator”.

No worry, though! In the more subtle sense of the word the LHC will soon be the most powerful scientifically. (And with great power comes….yeah, yeah*.) But seriously: with higher energy, which is what counts here, the LHC will be able to create new massive particles that the Tevatron simply cannot, and therefore begn to probe a new scientific realm."

..and once you have created these "particles" what will they do?

*Under-scores mine.

What is the relationship between recognition and realisation? This seems absolutely solid doesn't it? Without recognition there can be no realisation. If the potential for erotic transformation exists it must first be recognised, this is an harmonic process.
The "Pranava", "Om" or "Ogham" is taught in three parts: creation ("inception"), formation ("manifestation"), and completion ("full expression"),...but there is a real sense to their texts that the ancients believed as I do, that without full expression the process is unrecognisable* (again "seems obvious doesn't it?").

*and does not exist! (see note 12/08/10 below)

This "first principle" needs a name, I suggest "Mirroring".

(go to "Astrotometry" on "Hypertime" )

NB: Note language use; an application is not a dependency is it?

Lets rationlise..

Terminology; "Related", "Dependent", "Principle", "Potential", "Quality", "Application"

May we say that, "Relativity is a Quality of The Universe"*?

*See Astrotometric Theory.

Or that, "The "principles of exchange" are not the same as the "potential for exchange" (unless resolved to each other in which case the potentiality is realised and changes state -or "Potentate"-)"?

Channel Tunnel Update

Note geological profile picture on following link... ..a cursory examination suggests a possible breach on the French side.

Also note very little mention of seismic activity re: Channel Tunnel extant, however should you choose to become a member of The Geological Society you can download a 2010 "High-Definition Report" on the siesmic profile of the marine route (please see thread "What's That Coming Over the Hill?" ).

Astrotometry Update:

Qu:In what way might the above be incompatible with Hawking Radiation theory?.....

Astrotometry update..

New Readers Note: If you follow the chronology of my posts concerning "The Tunnel" on this site (esp. with reference to my threads "What's That Coming Over The Hill?" and "Penguins Can Fly"), you will discover that the stories concerning our local seismological state and the current ownership of the tunnel became extant after I had begun to write on the subject not before.

Perhaps the questions we need to ask Prof.Hawking are;"If we can observe mulitiple singularities does this tell us that there are multiple Universes or that there are multiple potential Universes, or quite the reverse (that there are not)?"

"Unsustainable Economy"; another way of expressing zero?

The point about "Deflation" is that it is an accelerative process (hence "Mobius" -see above-), our participation precludes observation (some might say, "obviously" ).

Astrotometry updates:

Also See: "Hawking, Susskind and Cohen "Sets and Axioms""
Go to 
& "What's that Coming Over The Hill?"go to:

AND  "Was a Dangerous Eurotunnel "Pensioned Off" (and if so by whom)?"Go to:


  1. Please note Medialens forum still undergoing maintenance at this time, therefore MediaLens links to threads currently defunked please search this blog for same titles, thank you. GKH

  2. Also see opening paragraph geocities & electrogravitics links now good (I do suspect "server monitoring" has caused this and certain other problems myself and -I know-, others have experienced researching on-line).