Monday 13 January 2014

The Dangers of Mobile Phones, Wi-Fi and Crazy People ("the bloodsuckers" -see lower page for quotes from previous posts on this blog-)!

Quote: "Mobiles 'cooking the brain'; brain tumors become children’s number one killer illness; and leaked industry memo admits 'wargaming' the science.
Seek truth from facts with former senior White House adviser Devra Davis, Storyleak editor Anthony Gucciardi, 'cell phone survivor' Bret Bocook, Microwave News editor Louis Slesin, top radiation biologist Dariusz Leszczynski, and Ellie Marks, whose husband Alan's suing the industry for his brain tumor.
Watch live on RT:
Sunday January 12 at 04:45, 08:45, 12:45, 16:45, 20:45 GMT.
Monday January 13 at 00:45 GMT.
For more information, please visit
Read the full transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
RT: My name's Daniel Bushell. Class action lawsuits filed against cell phone manufacturers. Coming up…
‪Insurers refuse public liability for cell phones.
The warning buried deep inside your mobile.
And the next'casualty catastrophe'after tobacco and asbestos.
Keith Philips, brain tumor survivor: I would hold my cell phone here and the tumor was right there.
Stuart Cobb, brain tumor survivor: I always held it on my right side, right here. The industry should have put these warnings on these phones a long time ago.
RT: Professor Dariusz Leszczynski is one of the world's leading radiation biologists, and brave. He knew phone manufacturers would try to end his career for printing groundbreaking research, proving cell phones do cause biological damage.
Professor Leszczynski joins us, great to see you. How did the industry react?
Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland: So far I think I didn’t experience any smear campaign. But in my case it was just that the industry used their influence to prevent funding of my research projects.
RT: But studies like Professor Leszczynski’s now allow top neurosurgeons to issue a stark cell phone warning.
Dr. Keith Black, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center neurosurgeon: It's essentially cooking the brain.
RT: Ellie Marks' husband Alan suffered serious memory loss after years of using a mobile.
At 2am one night he had a massive seizure. Surgeons found a tumor the size of a golf ball right where he held the phone.
Ellie, thank you so much for joining us. Why are you and so many others suing the industry?
Ellie Marks, wife of brain tumor victim: There’s many many many others that are already deceased from this and are dying from this, younger than my husband. Some as young as 28 who are deceased and their neurosurgeons actually told them that it was probably their cell phone use.
We had about 20 cities and states that wanted to legislate as San Francisco had and they were all threatened with lawsuits by this industry.
RT: This is a photo of Bret Bocook's brain. The top quarter responsible for body balance has had to be removed after surgeons found this vast tumor right where he held the phone.
A US national rowing champion, now he can barely move.
Bret, great to speak to you, tell us about the class action lawsuit against the phone industry.
Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim: The only way you can educate the public against big business is through lawsuits. That was how they did it with smoking. It was not until the District Attorneys in the United States got involved and sued the cigarette industry that they actually had a huge settlement, had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for public education as to the dangers of smoking.
That’s what’s going to happen with cell phones. It’s just unequivocal categorical that these things cause cancer. And also, they don’t want you to know that.
This is on the same trajectory as smoking. Because if you look at smoking in the '60s they had doctors coming on TV and saying 'Hey, smoke Marlboro, smoke this brand, because it's good for your cough.'
Camel cigarette commercial: And see how well Camels agree with your throat!
The Flintstonescigarette commercial: Winston, America's best selling best tasting filtered cigarette!
Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim: And more dangerous for children, because their skulls are a lot thinner. At least you can’t buy cigarettes unless you’re 18. But even a five-year-old can go and buy a phone.
RT: For phone manufacturers young children are targets. There are now working cell phones even for babies.
PCMag phone review: The glowPhone is for kids maybe five to eight and the flyPhone is for tweens.
RT: Samantha Miller's funeral was on her 18thbirthday.
Phone use through childhood first gave her headaches, reports the Daily Mail, then the brain tumor that killed her.
In the West, brain tumors have overtaken leukemia, notes Senator Lyn Allison, as the number one child killer illness.
But doctors warn that's the tip of the iceberg.
Clinical studies find young men who keep phones in their pockets have much lower chances of producing offspring, while women often store them on their chest.
Tiffany Frantz, breast cancer victim: I would just tuck it into my bra.
RT: Tiffany Frantz got breast cancer aged just 21, right where since childhood she's stored her phone.
These spots mark the areas of Donna Jaynes' cancer. Her doctors call this a ‘new breed of distribution’ that exactly matches where women keep their phone.
Dr. John West, Chairman, Breast Care Center: It’s a very unusual pattern where these multiple small cancers were confined to the upper inner aspect of the breast, I’ve never seen anything quite like this.
RT: This is a radiation detector, in normal surroundings around 30 microvolts/meter (µV/m).
Microwave ovens reach 800 µV/m. Wi-Fi routers use the same radiation technology.
Loading a film on a tablet PC reaches 2,000 µV/m.
Some of the world's best selling smartphones register over a thousand times above normal levels.
Insurers have in fact stopped covering cell phone manufacturers for public health.
Insurance firms privately call cell phones the next public ‘casualty catastrophe’ after asbestos and cigarettes.
Phone manufacturers have now quietly inserted a legal disclaimer.
On iPhones you have to go to Settings, General, About, at the bottom scroll down to Legal and at the end – RF Exposure, Radiofrequency Exposure.
Unlike most pages, the small print here can't be enlarged, but it reads: ‘Carry iPhone at least 10mm away from your body’
At the same time the industry says all its studies show phones are perfectly safe.
Thomas Wheeler, CTIA phone lobby head: Radio waves from cellular phones are safe.
RT: A 'conflict of interest' Harvard ethics professor Lawrence Lessig calls industry paid studies, which consistently conclude phone radiation is harmless.
Independent scientists meanwhile overwhelmingly find the most serious problems, from DNA damage to three times lower sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects.
Former senior White House advisor and leading epidemiologist Dr. Devra Davis has testified to Senate on the subject she joins us, great to see you.
How do you explain the completely opposite findings between industry and independent studies?
Dr. Devra Davis, author of Disconnect: Anytime there was independent research, what industry would do was three things: first they would go attack the scientists who have done the studies, they would try to get them fired, they’d try to get their funding taken away or they would accuse them of fraud.
When that didn’t work they hired other scientists who knew nothing about the field to do studies that looked like they were replicating the other studies but they really weren't.
And when all of those things failed, they wrote a memo in which they said if the cellular industry has done its job we think we war-gamed the science. That’s a quote - ‘war-gamed’ the science. Now science is not a matter of war, and it’s not a matter of games; we’re deadly serious about our health and that of our children.
RT: War-gaming, reveals this leaked Motorola document, is industry paid studies purely for reassuring the public.
Norman Sandler, Motorola: We have sufficiently war-gamed the issue.
RT: A sting has exposed how easy to get phoney studies in print.
Posing as a serious scientist, John Bohannon sent in a paper full of schoolboy errors, offering payment for publication.
Incredibly more than half the journals in these countries all around the world published it, even lying to the public that the study had been peer reviewed.
Investigative journalist Anthony Gucciardi has broken numerous health scandals, great to see you.
Surely big business wouldn't fake studies to put millions of lives at risk. Do we have documented precedents?
Anthony Gucciardi, Storyleak editor: This is exactly like Eli Lilly which in the 1980s knew that Prozac was leading to suicides and aggressive behavior, the exact opposite effect ofwhat they wanted. They knew that in the 1980s after they conducted the research. They hid the research and it wasn’t exposed until 2005 from the BBC.
But then they would have their corporate interests do studies and talk about how great it was. Now of course they’re required to admit that antidepressants do cause suicide, aggressive behavior, pretty much every shooter is on them.
When these cell phone companies are forced to admit that cell phone radiation does cause brain tumors, that it does do all this, and they’re already saying this in their manuals, so it’s already coming up. But once the public is aware of this fact, it will be even worse than antidepressants, it will be even worse than tobacco.
RT: We invited the powerful phone industry lobby CTIA to discuss the issues raised in this report.
They sent a one-line refusal.
CTIA phone industry lobby: Thank you for contacting us, but we will not be able to do this interview.
RT: The industry's most respected journalist is Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since 1981.
Louis, great to speak to you, there seems to be a parallel universe of what the industry says and everyone else.
Dr. Louis Slesin, Microwave News editor: The whole system is broken. People are not being told the truth, it's crazy. You know it's easy to say we made a mistake on tobacco after we know that tobacco’s a killer.The point is to take action.
RT: Action IS being taken outside the US.
France is moving schools back from Wi-Fi to cabled Internet.
Countries from Germany to Israel and Finland are moving to stop cell phone sales to kids.
But Obama just made industry chief lobbyist Thomas Wheeler head of the regulator itself, the FCC.
A former administration official calls it another astonishing conflict of interest.
So doctors who want parents at least informed of cell phone dangers to their kids say they aren't holding their breath.
Seek truth from facts. This is The Truthseeker. " For video go to:

Quote: "The most "open" (and therefore dangerous), secrets of all are the day-today "realpolitik" consequences of these and many, many other of our current administrations policies ("smells worse than a pile of fish in the middle of Manhattan" -and in case you don't believe us they've just delivered one-), such as; A.I.D.S, the asbestosis of 9/11 survivors, the children of Fullujah, Fukushima, Bhopal, the spread of more dangerous viruses, bacteria and fungi and the real cost of mobile-phone and other "wire-less" technologies. However above and beyond all of these is the perversion of science that "modern" man choses to call "particle beam research"*, "imagine you have two watches and you want to find out how they work so you smash them together and examine what remains" (to paraphrase one noted physicist). "Examine what remains?!" it never occurred to anyone to invent a screwdriver !?" (also see; "Dark Matters" -above-).

*Very few realise that military research in the aforementioned countries (see "Collusion?"), into particle beam weapons has been going on for decades (far longer than the extant "civil" research that now makes starry-eyed the acolytes of quantum physicists in science faculties throughout The World -whose lack of understanding is infact belied by the economic consequences of their actions, both in theory and practice-)." Go to:

Quote: "One senses that Mr.Assange's "hunt for the truth" would have benefited from a wider demographic. Like Rushdie he seems to think that one achieves more by dramatic martyrdom than considered action, again there is a sense that he is "preaching to the choir".
Could we lose the ability to disseminate vital information about the planet's welfare because certain so-called "Whistle Blowers" have poisoned the well of public confidence in the quest for ever more "sensational" revelations about the major powers?
Where is the information on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa (go to -Edited 11/12/10-)? What really happened to Vesta's off-shore wind-farm contracts? Where did A.I.D.S come from? What is the real cost of depleted uranium usage? How do you make a cow "mad"? Is flouride really dangerous? Does genetic modification represent a "Frankenstein's Monster"? Will your mobile phone, "Bluetooth" or "Wifi" rot your brain? What is the truth about the incineration industry or the CO2 profile of the nuclear industry? These are the vital questions." Go to:

Quote: "The Titanic Mentality

(to the memory of "The Covenant Intervention and the Ship "Invidious"")

"Iceberg, iceberg!"
It's a nasty thought that we might be holed below the waterline but isn't that the point?
"The point?" I hear you cry, "what's the point?"
That is over there on the top of that!
What characterises our problem with icebergs? Answer: the real dangerous part is the stuff you can't see!
Lets make a list:
1.The Nuclear Industry's radioactive fallout (also when bio-accumulated).
2.Dioxins and furans (also when bio-accumulated).
3.Heavy metals (also when bio-accumulated).
4.Chemical industrial wastes (also when bio-accumulated).
5.Wireless broadband (yes).
6.Mobile phones (yes also when bio-accumulated!)
7.Agri-business; Pestcides, herbicides, chemical fertilisers, unconsidered stock treatments (esp when "factory farming").
8.Modern medicine; radiological treatments/techniques, magnetic resonance imaging, dental amalgams and vaccine stabilisers (go to.... ), and the "hidden" menace of/in many modern medicines.
9.Particle beam research.
10.The arms industry and wars in general (or nasty accidents involving or having been caused by same).
11.Genetically modified crop pollens and pollens from "bio-medical" research.
12.The hidden results of animal experimentation.
13. "Nano"-Technology misuse.
14..CO2 production.
"Putting on our life-jackets yet? Are there enough life-boats?"..." Go to:

Quote: "On "Mobile Phones" (a "toothsome"article)

Strongest search engine response ever seen online by this researcher ("Yes, but an ostrich succeeds in appearing to be other than it is")
Search.. "Possible effects of mobile phones and Wifi technology on human nervous system"

Closely followed by the response for another inquiry
("No, that's an elephant")" Go to:


  1. Didn't know you had a blog... Will have to look at it regularly, then...

    1. Great, I dig horseradish.......(POWER!)

    2. Point of interest, I have heard that they used microwave weaponry on people who were protesting at the nuclear weapons sites. It is a directed beam, and would affect certain parts of the body- the parts hit by the beam. If you had your head targeted, and had your hands up at the same time, they would be hit, but not the rest of the body.

      I mention this, because they would appear as burns, and can appear again and again years after the event...

  2. Have you seen; "The Fourth Kind"? Quote: "With regard to the issue of disclosure, which is an intimate partner in this debate, I find it instructive that recent U.S government files and archives have revealled a substantial programme of psychological/mind control experiments on ususpecting patients abducted from mental health institutions in the U.S during the 60s and 70s. If we dovetail this information into "Roswell Conspiracy Theory" (re: Chris Carter, Frank Spotnitz*; which states that there has been an international conspiracy (instigated by the U.S) to occlude "Coanda Effect" and other technolgies via a prcocess of "alien obfuscation", the suspicion begins to form that the whole "abductee" conspiracy is another example of the American Government utlising "The Roswell Effect" to occlude it's own (completely indefensible) research on it's own population.
    Choking back our bile and disgust we might ask, "what were these experiments designed to achieve?!"

    *(Edit 02/06/10 Futhermore, as one examines "The Real X-Files" one realises that we are in the same position as our wiley opponent in that we "cannot see the wood for the trees".) " From "Dark Matters" Go to : on this blog May 2012

  3. I think you will find the experiments that happened in the sixites and seventies are still happening today.

    I have long suspected that MK-ULTRA never ended, and those experiments in the fifites would be ghastly primitive next to what they are doing now.

    MK is a fun topic for "conspiracy theorists," as it is used to explain certain things about celbreties and their actions. Britney didn't go crazy, she was realising the manipulation happening to her, the occuly rabbot hole she had found herself falling down, and shaved her hair off to try and regain control.

    If you doubt me, that there is something very wrong with her life and career, listen to "Baby One More Time" backwards. Better yet, watch te video backwards.

    You get "sleep with me I'm not too young," five or six times, and each time is when it is most sugfestive; she is dancing in a way that pits her breasts on display, or the look to the camera is suggestive or inviting...

    She was sixteen at the time. There is no way she did this. It is not some coincidence. So... Who put it all there?

    In fact, reverse loads of songs, and you will find stuff. It is all subliminal conditioning, to mould us into a certain type of population. This started in the eighties, from what I understand.

    Oh, and even forwards, the song is wrong. When you look at the lyrics, "hit me baby one more time" is incongruant with the topic of the song. It should be "love me baby one more time." So, unless it is all about punching her, you have another reference to sex.

    I have no idea about this "fourth kind" you were mentioning.

  4. "The Fourth Kind" is a movie supposedly based on a true story about a psychologist who gets involved with some creepy disappearances in the American North West (maybe "Alaska" actually), evetually "losing" one of her children to "the abductors"....