Monday, 21 September 2015

British Pharmaceutical Company Glaxo-Smith-Kline Fined $488.8 Million for "Massive Bribery Network" with Doctors (& more on W.H.O vaccines controversy)

Quote: "Think that the medical doctors don’t get kickbacks for prescribing certain medications? Think again!
China has fined the British pharmaceuticals giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) $488.8 million (3 billion Yuan) for a “massive bribery network” to get doctors and hospitals to use its products. Five former employees were sentenced to two to four years in jail, but ordered deported instead of imprisoned, according to state news agency Xinhua today.
The guilty verdict was delivered after a one day closed door trail in Changsha, the capital city of Hunan province. The fine was the biggest ever imposed by a Chinese court.
The court gave Mark Reilly, former head of GSK Chinese operations, a three-year prison sentence with a four-year reprieve, which meant he is set to be deported instead of serving his time in a Chinese jail. His co-defendants received two to four years prison sentences with reprieves.
Reilly was accused of operating a “massive bribery network” in May. The police said it is believed Reilly authorized his salespeople to pay doctors, hospital officials and health institutions to use GSK’s products since 2009.
Chinese authorities first announced the investigation on GSK in July 2013. The police said the company had funneled up to 3 billion Yuan to travel agencies to facilitate bribes to doctors and officials. The money was the exact amount of the fine.
Throughout 2012 a stream of anonymous emails alleging bribery authorized by senior staff at GSK were sent to Chinese regulators, according to media reports. Atthe beginning of 2013, the anonymous emails began to arrive at GSK headquarter in London, along with a sex tape of Mark Reilly and his Chinese girlfriend, according to media reports.
The charges claim that GSK hired Shanghai-based investigator Peter Humphrey and his American wife, Yu Yingzeng, to locate the whistleblower. The Humphreys were detained and charged with illegally obtaining phone logs, travel records and other data which then they put in a report to GSK.
 GSK released a statement of apologies to the Chinese government and people on its website.“GSK Plc has reflected deeply and learned from its mistakes, has taken steps to comprehensively rectify the issues identified at the operations of GSKCI, and must work hard to regain the trust of the Chinese people,” the statement said.
The statement also said future commitments include investment in Chinese science, improved access of its products in both city and rural areas across the country through greater expansion of production and flexible pricing.
Taking bribery from drug companies and over prescribing medicine to patients is a common hidden rule among doctors in China. It is not uncommon for patients give doctors red envelopes with cash as a blunt plea for them to do a good job on surgeries." Go to: http://www.healthfreedoms.org/glaxosmithkline-fined-488-8-million-dollars-for-massive-bribery-network-with-doctors/

Quote: "My Mother's health was compromised by Ramipril (one of the "new generation" -"flash-in-the-pan"-, blood pressure drugs), and her death caused by a combination of her compromised immune system and inspired glyphosate ("Round-Up"), I am more or less certain, she died of lung cancer ..Check out The Patient's Forum, go to: http://patient.info/forums/discuss/browse/ramipril-3132
Go to: http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/mothers-death-was-hastened-by-long.html

Quote: "As you all know, the World Health Organization or the WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends.
“In the 21st century, health is a shared responsibility, involving equitable access to essential care and collective defense against transnational threats. “


What is interesting is that one of the board members of the WHO, Prof Anne Kelso is also a MAJOR shareholder in CSL Ltd (page 6 of this document shows the affiliation of adviser and company). 1



What is CSL and how do they affect me? Well, CSL is a global biotherapy company that makes many pharmaceuticals and vaccines. CSL is one of the worlds largest producers of named branded vaccines that are scheduled and injected in people around the world today. Gardasil, Fluvax,M-M-R II and others are among the long list of their products. Their flu vaccines are widely sold in the US and other countries.
3


Now, I don’t know about you, but I have an issue with an adviser to the World Health Organization who is reaping financial gains off of company she owns shares of. I would be scheduling vaccines every hour if I could, I mean what is the logic in having someone like that influencing the scheduling of vaccines? I understand the need for knowledgeable people to help navigate the serious issues at the WHO, but couldn’t they have gotten a different candidate? It’s hard to trust the situation and who is making decisions at the WHO.  I decided to dig a little bit and see what I could find.  We couldnt find a current Vaccine Market Document but this is from 2012.
It seemed to me, the World Health Orgnazation was promoting an industry by this 2012 pdf document I found on their website

2
Seems like they are excited about this new business and opportunity! Check out the world sales data
4

It sure does seem like a lot of money invlolved with these companies and the drugs they sell. Take a look at the companies bought just in the 2005-2012 time-frame bought by large pharmaceutical companies looking to cash in vaccines related products .
Untitled-4

As you can see, even back in 2012 they raked in the cash from vaccines. That is some serious revenue off of a few products!
Untitled-4
It just goes to show you how big a business vaccines really are. The same people who influence companies and governments are the same who  benefit most from the revenue their influence generated." Go to: http://edgytruth.com/2015/03/09/board-member-of-the-world-health-organization-is-a-large-shareholder-in-csl-vaccine-company/

H1N1 Gastro-intestinal Swine-flu and the World Health Organisation's Vaccine "Stockpile"

Quote: "I've got it, I'm sure of that (people whose systems could be more easily compromised did), and have now since the outbreak, there is no natural immunity and the virus doesn't present in any other way in this form (apart from morning "shivers" and slight temperature elevations -oh and morning diarrhoea-). I remember however warnings (that were quashed at the time), concerning the virus's escape into the population via "the gastric route"! This stinks (and I mean that most sincerely folks), and mine has if anything been getting worse , this silent killer has been loosed upon the population at a time of most vulnerability (makes "one" think of The Four Horsemen themselves)"..."I have stated I believe many cases of gastrointestinal swine-flu remain undiagnosed ("hidden" in the population of the poorly advised and wary).

You know I suspect that things have been left this way because they know they cannot treat it! "..

 "WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies” – The BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism report

Conflicts of Interest

– A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning

– The secrecy of the committee is also fuelling conspiracy theories, particularly around the activation of dormant pandemic vaccine contracts. A key question will be whether the pharmaceutical companies, which had invested around $4bn (£2.8bn, 3.3bn) in developing the swine flu vaccine, had supporters inside the emergency committee

The original advisory opinion was requested by...

- Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines?

- Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir?

- Why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO?

- Our investigation has identified key scientists involved in WHO pandemic planning who had declarable interests, some of whom are or have been funded by pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were drafting

- FDA’s advisory committee voted by 13 to 4 not to approve zanamivir on the grounds that it was no more effective than placebo when the patients were on other drugs such as paracetamol. He said that it didn’t reduce symptoms even by a day.

- conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.”

- the advisory committee decided not to recommend zanamivir, the FDA’s management reassigned the oseltamivir review to someone else. Dr Elashoff believes that the approval of zanamivir paved the way for oseltamivir, which was approved by the FDA later that year.

- “WHO never publishes individual DOIs [declaration of interest], except after consultation with the Office of the Director-General.

Deborah Cohen, features editor, BMJ, Philip Carter, journalist, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, London"...and...
"Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing. These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.” Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter investigate
Next week marks the first anniversary of the official declaration of the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. On 11 June 2009 Dr Margaret Chan, the director general of the World Health Organization, announced to the world’s media: “I have conferred with leading influenza experts, virologists, and public health officials. In line with procedures set out in the International Health Regulations, I have sought guidance and advice from an Emergency Committee established for this purpose. On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met…The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”
It was the culmination of 10 years of pandemic preparedness planning for WHO—years of committee meetings with experts flown in from around the world and reams of draft documents offering guidance to governments. But one year on, governments that took advice from WHO are unwinding their vaccine contracts, and billions of dollars’ worth of stockpiled oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza)—bought from health budgets already under tight constraints—lie unused in warehouses around the world."
For full article go to: http://linkis.com/engineeringevil.com/yMfGC
 "Also see;  "#NoNaturalImmunity H1N1 Gastrointestinal Swine-Flu: The World Health Organisation and The Silent Killer" Go to:
http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/nonaturalimmunity-h1n1-gastrointestinal.html

 

No comments:

Post a Comment